Home Dental Radiology Can lower third molar position indicate the need for preoperative cone beam computed tomography exploration of retromolar canal?

Can lower third molar position indicate the need for preoperative cone beam computed tomography exploration of retromolar canal?

by adminjay


  • Schejtman R, Devoto FC, Arias NH. The origin and distribution of the elements of the human mandibular retromolar canal. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12:1261–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1493–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alves N, Deana NF. Anatomical and radiographical study of the retromolar canal and retromolar foramen in macerated mandibles. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;15:4292–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Moreno Rabie C, Vranckx M, Rusque MI, Deambrosi C, Ockerman A, Politis C, Jacobs R. Anatomical relation of third molars and the retromolar canal. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:765–70.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gamieldien MY, Van Schoor A. Retromolar foramen: an anatomical study with clinical considerations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:784–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kikuta S, Iwanaga J, Nakamura K, Hino K, Nakamura M, Kusukawa J. The retromolar canals and foramina: radiographic observation and application to oral surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:647–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hou Y, Feng G, Lin W, Wang R, Yuan H. Observation of retromolar canals on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2020;36:365–70.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patil S, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Araki K, Okano T. Retromolar canals as observed on cone-beam computed tomography: their incidence, course, and characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:692–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Truong MK, He P, Adeeb N, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J. Clinical anatomy and significance of the retromolar foramina and their canals: a literature review. Cureus. 2017;9: e1781.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Capote TS, Gonçalves MA, Campos JA. Retromolar canal associated with age, side, sex, bifid mandibular canal, and accessory mental foramen in panoramic radiographs of Brazilians. Anat Res Int. 2015;2015:434083.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sisman Y, Sekerci AE, Payveren-Arikan M, Sahman H. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with panoramic images in predicting retromolar canal during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20:74–81.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PH, de Azambuja B-C, Stinkens L, Moyaert K, Rubira-Bullen IR, Jacobs R. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:387–93.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iida S, Hassfeld S, Reuther T, Nomura K, Mühling J. Relationship between the risk of mandibular angle fractures and the status of incompletely erupted mandibular third molars. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005;33:158–63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antic S, Milicic B, Jelovac DB, Djuric M. Impact of the lower third molar and injury mechanism on the risk of mandibular angle and condylar fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2016;32:286–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winter G. Principles of Exodontia as applied to the impacted third molars. St. Louis: American Medical Book Company; 1926.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1237–43.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shin HS, Nam KC, Park H, Choi HU, Kim HY, Park CS. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20130439.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiang W, Qiang F, Lin L. Estimation of effective dose of dental x-ray devices. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2019;183:417–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, Scheske MJ. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140197.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B, DIMITRA Research Group. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:308–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luangchana P, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Kitisubkanchana J, Wongchuensoontorn C. The retromolar canal and its variations: Classification using cone beam computed tomography. Quintessence Int. 2018;49:61–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nikkerdar N, Golshah A, Norouzi M, Falah-Kooshki S. Incidence and anatomical properties of retromolar canal in an Iranian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int J Dent. 2020;9:9178973.


    Google Scholar
     

  • von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod. 2011;37:1630–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Narayana K, Nayak UA, Ahmed WN, Bhat JG, Devaiah BA. The retromolar foramen and canal in south Indian dry mandibles. Eur J Anat. 2002;6:141–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schneider T, Filo K, Kruse AL, Locher M, Grätz KW, Lübbers HT. Variations in the anatomical positioning of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth and their practical implications. Swiss Dent J. 2014;124:520–38.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:548–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Matzenn LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review – based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140189.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim TS, Caruso JM, Christensen H, Torabinejad M. A comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures. J Endodont. 2010;36:1191–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maret D, Telmon N, Peters OA, Lepage B, Treil J, Inglese JM, Peyre A, Kahn JL, Sixou M. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:649–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palma LF, Buck AF, Kfouri FA, Blachman IT, Lombardi LA, Cavalli MA. Evaluation of retromolar canals on cone beam computerized tomography scans and digital panoramic radiographs. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;21:307–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ngeow WC, Chai WL. The clinical significance of the retromolar canal and foramen in dentistry. Clin Anat. 2021;34:512–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles