Home Dental Radiology Cone-beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolar and mandibular fractures

Cone-beam computed tomography imaging of dentoalveolar and mandibular fractures

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Gassner R, Bösch R, Tuli T, Emshoff R. Prevalence of dental trauma in 6000 patients with facial injuries: implications for prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(1):27–33.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100(2):75–96.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Malara P, Malara B, Drugacz J. Characteristics of maxillofacial injuries resulting from road traffic accidents—a 5 year review of the case records from Department of Maxillofacial Surgery in Katowice, Poland. Head Face Med. 2006;2:27.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Kamulegeya A, Lakor F, Kabenge K. Oral maxillofacial fractures seen at a Ugandan tertiary hospital: a six-month prospective study. Clinics. 2009;64(9):843–8.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Shintaku WH, Venturin JS, Azevedo B, Noujeim M. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol. 2009;25(4):358–66.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Arabion HR, Tabrizi R, Aliabadi E, Gholami M, Zarei K. A retrospective analysis of maxillofacial trauma in Shiraz, Iran: a 6-year-study of 768 patients (2004–2010). J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2014;15(1):15–21.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Yilmaz SY, Misirlioglu M, Adisen MZ. A diagnosis of maxillary sinus fracture with cone-beam CT: case report and literature review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7(2):85–91.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Özdede M, Sarıkır Ç, Akarslan Z, Peker İ. Maksillofasiyal fraktürlerin konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni. 2016;26(1):8–14.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Yaşar M, Bayram A, Doğan M, Sağit M, Kaya A, Özcan İ, et al. Retrospective analysis of surgically managed maxillofacial fractures in Kayseri Training and Research Hospital. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;54(1):5–9.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 1: traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23(2):95–104.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Fisekcioglu E, Bayirli G. Detection of jaw and root fractures using cone beam computed tomography: a case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(3):169–73.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Fox LA, Vannier MW, West OC, Wilson AJ, Baran GA, Pilgram TK. Diagnostic performance of CT, MPR and 3DCT imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1995;19(5):385–95.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Schuknecht B, Graetz K. Radiologic assessment of maxillofacial, mandibular, and skull base trauma. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(3):560–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Sirin Y, Guven K, Horasan S, Sencan S. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(6):336–42.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Eskandarlou A, Poorolajal J, Talaeipour AR, Talebi S, Talaeipour M. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol. 2014;30(2):162–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Lam EWN. Trauma. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014. p. 562–81.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Aydin U, Gormez O, Yildirim D. Cone-beam computed tomography findings of dentomaxillofacial fractures. Eur Congr Radiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2016/C-0711.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(3):396–418.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Choudhary AB, Motwani MB, Degwekar SS, Bhowate RR, Banode PJ, Yadav AO, et al. Utility of digital volume tomography in maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(6):135–40.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Kaeppler G, Cornelius CP, Ehrenfeld M, Mast G. Diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography for mandibular fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(1):98–104.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Gohel A, Oda M, Katkar AS, Sakai O. Multidetector row computed tomography in maxillofacial imaging. Dent Clin N Am. 2018;62(3):453–65.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Nasseh I, Al-Rawi W. cone beam computed tomography. Dent Clin N Am. 2018;62(3):361–91.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Cohnen M, Kemper J, Möbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(3):634–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75–80.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(6):609–25.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Dölekoğlu S, Fişekçioğlu E, Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Bayirli G. Diagnosis of jaw and dentoalveolar fractures in a traumatized patient with cone beam computed tomography. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(2):200–3.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Ma RH, Ge ZP, Li G. Detection accuracy of root fractures in cone-beam computed tomography images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016;49(7):646–54.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Neubauer J, Neubauer C, Gerstmair A, Krauss T, Reising K, Zajonc H, et al. comparison of the radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in examinations of the hand. Rofo. 2016;188(5):488–93.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Chindasombatjaroen J, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Maeda Y, Furukawa S. Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metals: comparison of cone-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners. Oral Radiol. 2011;27(2):114–20.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):265–73.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    De Crop A, Casselman J, Van Hoof T, Dierens M, Vereecke E, Bossu N, et al. Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference? Neuroradiology. 2015;57(8):841–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Xi Y, Jin Y, De Man B, Wang G. High-kVp assisted metal artifact reduction for X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Access. 2016;4:4769–76.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Seeram E. Computed tomography: a technical review. Radiol Technol. 2018;89(3):279CT–302CT.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52(4):707–30.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(2):257–65.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Kameoka S, Akiyama Y, Honjoya T, Ejima K, et al. Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36(8):465–71.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Panzarella FK, Junqueira JL, Oliveira LB, de Araújo NS, Costa C. Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(6):369–78.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Schutyser F, Debaveye D, Bogaerts R, et al. Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005;117(1–3):211–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Ballanti F, Lione R, Fiaschetti V, Fanucci E, Cozza P. Low-dose CT protocol for orthodontic diagnosis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2008;9(2):65–70.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    European Commission. Radiation protection no. 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. A report prepared by the SEDENTEXCT project. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2012. (Available from http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf)

  • 41.

    Brito-Júnior M, Santos LA, Faria-e-Silva AL, Pereira RD, Sousa-Neto MD. Ex vivo evaluation of artifacts mimicking fracture lines on cone-beam computed tomography produced by different root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2014;47(1):26–31.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Cone-beam computed tomography: time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45:263–5.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, Scheske MJ. Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140197. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140197.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Cone-beam computed tomography: volume acquisition. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014. p. 185–98.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(5):1553–61.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(6):323–35.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2012;20(1):1–17.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Gonzalez SM. Implants. In: Gonzalez SM, editor. Interpretation basics of cone beam computed tomography. 1st ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2014. p. 167–75.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31(2):126–30.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Kajan ZD, Taromsari M. Value of cone beam CT in detection of dental root fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(1):3–10.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Moudi E, Haghanifar S, Madani Z, Alhavaz A, Bijani A, Bagheri M. Assessment of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(1):37–41.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Brooks SL. Prescribing diagnostic imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014. p. 259–70.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Kositbowornchai S, Sikram S, Nuansakul R, Thinkhamrop B. Root fracture detection on digital images: effect of the zoom function. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19(3):154–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Avsever H, Gunduz K, Orhan K, Uzun İ, Ozmen B, Egrioglu E, et al. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of horizontal root fractures: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(1):285–92.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Moule AJ, Kahler B. Diagnosis and management of teeth with vertical root fractures. Aust Dent J. 1999;44(2):75–87.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Aydın Ü. Vertikal kök kırıkları: klinik ve radyografik bulgular, risk faktörleri. ADO J Clin Sci. 2012;5(4):1019–26.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Long H, Zhou Y, Ye N, Liao L, Jian F, Wang Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for tooth fractures: a meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014;42(3):240–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Özer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod. 2011;37(1):75–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Da Silveira PF, Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, da Silveira HLD, Montagner F, da Silveira HE. Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography—an in vitro analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2013;29(1):41–6.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Bragatto FP, Filho LI, Kasuya AVB, Chicarelli M, Queiroz AF, Takeshita WM, Iwaki LCV. Accuracy in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures, external root resorptions, and root perforations using cone-beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes of acquisition. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(6):573–7.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Parrone MT, Bechara B, Deahl ST 2nd, Ruparel NB, Katkar R, Noujeim M. Cone beam computed tomography image optimization to detect root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro (phantom) study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(5):613–20.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Corbella S, Del Fabbro M, Tamse A, Rosen E, Tsesis I, Taschieri S. Cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(5):593–602.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Salineiro FCS, Kobayashi-Velasco S, Braga MM, Cavalcanti MGP. Radiographic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, meta-analyses and sources of heterogeneity. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(8):20170400.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Baageel TM, Allah EH, Bakalka GT, Jadu F, Yamany I, Jan AM, Bogari DF, Alhazzazi TY. Vertical root fracture: biological effects and accuracy of diagnostic imaging methods. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(Suppl 2):S93–104.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(4):813–20.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Brüllmann D, Schulze RKW. Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications—what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140204.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Varshosaz M, Tavakoli MA, Mostafavi M, Baghban AA. Comparison of conventional radiography with cone beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci. 2010;52(4):593–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Wang P, Yan XB, Lui DG, Zhang WL, Zhang Y, Ma XC. Detection of dental root fractures by using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):290–8.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Pittayapat P, Galiti D, Huang Y, Dreesen K, Schreurs M, Souza PC, et al. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):293–300.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Cone-beam computed tomography: volume preparation. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2014. p. 199–213.


    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment