Home Dental Radiology Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle’s classification

Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in permanent dentition according to Angle’s classification

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Piancino MG, Cannavale R, Dalmasso P, Tonni I, Garagiola U, Perillo L, Olivieri AN. Cranial structure and condylar asymmetry of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a risky growth pattern. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:2667–73.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Caruso S, Storti E, Nota A, Ehsani S, Gatto R. Temporomandibular joint anatomy assessed by CBCT images. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2916953.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Stocum DL, Roberts WE. Part I: development and physiology of the temporomandibular joint. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16:360–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Shroff B. Malocclusion as a cause for temporomandibular disorders and orthodontics as a treatment. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30:299–302.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Saccucci M, D’Attilio M, Rodolfino D, Festa F, Polimeni A, Tecco S. Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects. Head Face Med. 2012;8:34.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Kim HO, Lee W, Kook YA, Kim Y. Comparison of the condyle-fossa relationship between skeletal class III malocclusion patients with and without asymmetry: a retrospective three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomograpy study. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43:209–17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Schlueter B, Kim KB, Oliver D, Sortiropoulos G. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:880–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Ueki K, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:1424–32 (discussion 1432–1424).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Coskuner HG, Ciger S. Three-dimensional assessment of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular dimensions after early correction of the maxillary arch form in patients with class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:121–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Ma Q, Bimal P, Mei L, Olliver S, Farella M, Li H. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:589–98.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Pullinger A, Hollender L. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60:329–34.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:1063–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in class II and class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:337–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Kuroda S, Tanimoto K, Izawa T, Fujihara S, Koolstra JH, Tanaka E. Biomechanical and biochemical characteristics of the mandibular condylar cartilage. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17:1408–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Meikle MC. Remodeling the dentofacial skeleton: the biological basis of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. J Dent Res. 2007;86:12–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E, Laskin DM. Comparison of the stress direction on the TMJ in patients with class I, II, and III skeletal relationships. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:43–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103:299–312.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103:395–411.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Manfredini D, Segu M, Arveda N, Lombardo L, Siciliani G, Alessandro R, Guarda-Nardini L. Temporomandibular joint disorders in patients with different facial morphology. A systematic review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:29–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, Petersson A. Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;91:200–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Vitral RW, da Silva Campos MJ, Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR. Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140:18–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Soliman SAZ, El Boghdadi DM. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2018;79:245–58.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Radescu OD, Colosi HA, Albu S. Effects of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and twin block mandibular advancement device (MAD) on pharyngeal structures in class II pediatric patients from Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Cranio 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2018.1475940.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Droel R, Isaacson RJ. Some relationships between the glenoid fossa position and various skeletal discrepancies. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:64–78.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Fernandez Sanroman J, Gomez Gonzalez JM, del Hoyo JA. Relationship between condylar position, dentofacial deformity and temporomandibular joint dysfunction: an MRI and CT prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:35–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:55–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Kikuchi K, Takeuchi S, Tanaka E, Shibaguchi T, Tanne K. Association between condylar position, joint morphology and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients without temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:1070–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Vitral RW, Telles Cde S, Fraga MR, de Oliveira RS, Tanaka OM. Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions: condyle–fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:48–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Abbaszade H. Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77:350–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment