Tshering Vogel DW, Thoeny HC. Cross-sectional imaging in cancers of the head and neck: how we review and report. Cancer Imaging. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0075-3.
Surov A, Stumpp P, Meyer HJ, et al. Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI: associations between diffusion, glucose metabolism and histopathological parameters in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.04.009.
Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2202010063.
Yan B, Liang X, Zhao T, et al. Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer? Acta radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120915596.
Han M, Kim SY, Lee SJ, et al. The correlations between MRI perfusion, diffusion parameters, and 18 F-FDG PET metabolic parameter sin primary head-and-neck cancer a cross-sectional analysis in single institute. Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002141.
Rahim MK, Kim SE, So H, et al. Recent trends in PET image interpretations using volumetric and texture-based quantification methods in nuclear oncology. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-013-0260-2.
Lee SJ, Choi JY, Lee HJ, et al. Prognostic value of volume-based 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT parameters in patients with clinically node-negative oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Korean J Radiol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.752.
Cacicedo J, Navarro A, Del Hoyo O, et al. Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist. Br J Radiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160217.
Assar OS, Fischbein NJ, Caputo GR, et al. Metastatic head and neck cancer: role and usefulness of FDG PET in locating occult primary tumors. Radiology. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja48177.
Chang M-C, Chen J-H, Liang J-A, et al. Accuracy of whole-body FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT in M staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.031.
Chang JT-C, Chan S-C, Yen T-C, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.057.
Choi SH, Paeng JC, Sohn CH, et al. Correlation of 18 F-FDG uptake with apparent diffusion coefficient ratio measured on standard and high b value diffusion MRI in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.089334.
Leifels L, Purz S, Stumpp P, et al. Parameters in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma depend on tumor grading. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5369625.
Fruehwald-Pallamar J, Czerny C, Mayerhoefer ME, et al. Functional imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Correlation of PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1718-4.
Al-Bakri M, Rasmussen AK, Thomsen C, et al. Orbital volumetry in graves’ orbitopathy: muscle and fat involvement in relation to dysthyroid optic neuropathy. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/435276.
Varoquaux A, Rager O, Lovblad KO, et al. Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2351-9.
Gawlitza M, Purz S, Kubiessa K, et al. In vivo correlation of glucose metabolism, cell density and microcirculatory parameters in patients with head and neck cancer: initial results using simultaneous PET/MRI. PLoS ONE. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134749.
Martens RM, Noij DP, Koopman T, et al. Predictive value of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and 18-F-FDG-PET in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by (chemo)radiotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.031.
Samołyk-Kogaczewska N, Sierko E, Zuzda K, et al. PET/MRI-guided GTV delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01480-3.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2003) Clinical Guidelines. In: London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11822/ Accessed 01 Dec 2019
Bayne M, Hicks RJ, Everitt S, et al. Reproducibility of “Intelligent” contouring of gross tumor volume in non–small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.032.
Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish J Emerg Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
Rasmussen JH, Nørgaard M, Hansen AE, et al. Feasibility of multiparametric imaging with PET/MR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.180091.
Just N. Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms. Br J Cancer. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.512.
Rigo P, Paulus P, Kaschten BJ, et al. Oncological applications of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249629.
Varoquaux A, Rager O, Dulguerov P, et al. Diffusion-weighted and PET/MR imaging after radiation therapy for malignant head and neck tumors. Radiographics. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140029.
Gu J, Khong P-L, Wang S, et al. Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0433-7.
Deng S, Wu Z, Wu Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and standardized uptake value in malignant disease. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4729547.
Nakajo M, Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, et al. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of prognostic significance between primary tumor standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient. Clin Nucl Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318248524a.
Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, et al. Complementary roles of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET: the state of the art and potential applications. J Nucl Med. 2010. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.073908.
Haberkorn U, Strauss LG, Reisser C, et al. Glucose uptake, perfusion, and cell proliferation in head and neck tumors: relation of positron emission tomography to flow cytometry. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1548–55.
Minn H, Joensuu H, Ahonen A, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging: a method to assess the proliferative activity of human cancer in vivo. Comparison with DNA flow cytometry in head and neck tumors. Cancer. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880501)61:9%3c1776::AID-CNCR2820610909%3e3.0.CO;2-7.
Yun TJ, Kim J, Kim KH, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: differentiation of histologic grade with standard- and high-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI. Head Neck. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23008.
Paidpally V, Chirindel A, Lam S, Agrawal N, Quon H, Subramaniam RM. FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Imaging Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2217/iim.12.60.
Surov A, Meyer HJ, Winter K, et al. Histogram analysis parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient reflect tumor cellularity and proliferation activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25284.
Singer AD, Pattany PM, Fayad LM, et al. Volumetric segmentation of ADC maps and utility of standard deviation as measure of tumor heterogeneity in soft tissue tumors. Clin Imaging. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.11.017.
