Home Dental Radiology Cross-contamination and infection control in intraoral digital imaging: a comprehensive review

Cross-contamination and infection control in intraoral digital imaging: a comprehensive review

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Bartoloni JA, Chariton DG, Flint DJ. Infection control practices in dental radiology. Gen Dent. 2003;51:264–71.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1304–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Chidambaranathan AS, Balasubramanium M. Comprehensive review and comparison of the disinfection techniques currently available in the literature. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e849–56.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003 CDC infection control recommendations for dental health-care settings. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(1 Suppl):43–48, 50–53.

  • 5.

    Silva MAS, Martins MV, Medici Filho E, Moraes LC, Castilho JCM, Jorge AOC. Evaluation of the efficiency of an infection control protocol in dental radiology by means of microbiological analysis. Cienc Odontol Bras. 2004;7:15–21.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    MacDonald DS, Waterfield JD. Infection control in digital intraoral radiography: evaluation of microbiological contamination of photostimulable phosphor plates in barrier envelopes. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b93.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Malta CP, Damasceno NN, Ribeiro RA, Silva CS, Devito KL. Microbiological contamination in digital radiography: evaluation at the radiology clinic of an educational institution. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016;29:239–47.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Freitas CVS, Dias LS, Araújo CS, da Silva VC, Monteiro-Neto V, Souza JIL. Assessment of microbiological contamination of radiographic devices in School of Dentistry. Braz Dent Sci. 2012;15:39–46.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Hokett SD, Honey JR, Ruiz F, Baisden MK, Hoen MM. Assessing the effectiveness of direct digital radiography barrier sheaths and finger cots. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:463–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. An update on radiographic practices: information and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:234–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, Van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:93–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Geist JR, Katz JO. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:496–505.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    van der Stelt PF. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(Suppl):7S–13S.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Kalathingal SM, Moore S, Kwon S, Schuster GS, Shrout MK, Plummer K. An evaluation of microbiologic contamination on phosphor plates in a dental school. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:279–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Matzen LH, Christensen J, Wenzel A. Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:566–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Wenzel A, Møystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68:106–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Ludlow JB, Mol A. Digital imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2014. p. 41–62.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Choi JW. Perforation rate of intraoral barriers for direct digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140245.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Wenzel A, Frandsen E, Hintze H. Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor. J Dent. 1999;27:243–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Parks ET, Williamson GF. Digital radiography: an overview. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002;3:23–39.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Negron W, Mauriello SM, Peterson CA, Arnold R. Cross-contamination of the PSP sensor in a preclinical setting. J Dent Hyg. 2005;79:8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:1379–87.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:485–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Hunter A, Kalathingal S, Shrout M, Plummer K, Looney S. The effectiveness of a pre-procedural mouthrinse in reducing bacteria on radiographic phosphor plates. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:149–54.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Hubar JS, Gardiner DM. Infection control procedures used in conjunction with computed dental radiography. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:259–67.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Koch S, Wagner IV, Schneider W. Effective and quality-controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:107–18.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Kalathingal S, Youngpeter A, Minton J, Shrout M, Dickinson D, Plummer K, et al. An evaluation of microbiologic contamination on a phosphor plate system: is weekly gas sterilization enough? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:457–62.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    de Souza TM, de Castro RD, de Vasconcelos LC, Pontual AD, de Moraes Ramos Perez FM, Pontual ML. Microbial contamination in intraoral phosphor storage plates: the dilemma. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:301–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Kohn WG, Collins AS, Cleveland JL, Harte JA, Eklund KJ, Malvitz DM, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings-2003. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52(RR-17):1–61.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Wenzel A, Kornum F, Knudsen M, Lau EF. Antimicrobial efficiency of ethanol and 2-propanol alcohols used on contaminated storage phosphor plates and impact on durability of the plate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20120353.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Peker I, Peker E, Basman A, Akca G, Odabas ME, Haciosmanoglu N, et al. A pilot study of the effects of a vacuum sealing barrier method for photostimulable phosphor plates regarding plate damage and prevention of microbiologic cross-contamination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126:283–90.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Charuakkra A, Prapayasatok S, Janhom A, Verochana K, Mahasantipiya P. Infection control and patient discomfort with an alternative plastic barrier in intraoral digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160253.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Kuperstein AS. Defective plastic infection-control barriers and faulty technique may cause PSP plate contamination used in digital intraoral radiography. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(3 Suppl):46–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Hubar JS, Oeschger MP. Optimizing efficiency of radiograph disinfection. Gen Dent. 1995;43:360–2.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Fernandes LMPSR, Zapata RO, Rubira-Bullen IRF, Capelozza ALA. Microbiologic cross contamination and infection control in intraoral conventional and digital radiology. RGO Rev Gaúcha Odontol. 2013;61:609–14.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    da Cunha Mendes GC, da Silva Brandão TR, Miranda Silva CL. Ethylene oxide potential toxicity. Expert Rev Med Dev. 2008;5:323–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Peterson CA, Mauriello SM, Arnold RR, Webster-Cyrique J. Infection control for a digital imaging sensor. J Dent Res. 2002;81(Special Issue A):A-111.


    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment