McNamara, J. A. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 51, 177–202 (1981).
Kerr, W. J. & O’Donnell, J. M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br. J. Orthod. 17, 299–304 (1990).
Cochrane, S., Cunningham, S. & Hunt, N. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthognath. Surg. 14, 291–295 (1999).
Tung, A. W. & Kiyak, H. A. Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 113, 29–39 (1998).
Chan, A., Antoun, J. S., Morgaine, K. C. & Farella, M. Accounts of bullying on Twitter in relation to dentofacial features and orthodontic treatment. J. Oral Rehabil. 44, 244–250 (2017).
de Sena, L. M. F., Damasceno e Araújo, L. A. L., Farias, A. C. R. & Pereira, H. S. G. The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 22, 77–86 (2017).
Griffin, A. M. & Langlois, J. H. Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad?. Soc. Cogn. 24, 187–206 (2006).
Choi, W. S., Lee, S., McGrath, C. & Samman, N. Change in quality of life after combined orthodontic-surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endodontol. 109, 46–51 (2010).
Von Bremen, J., Erbe, C., Pancherz, H. & Ruf, S. Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance. J. Orofac. Orthop. 75, 167–174 (2014).
O’Brien, K. et al. Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 135, 580–585 (2009).
O’Neill, K., Harkness, M. & Knight, R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 118, 371–376 (2000).
Santamaría-Villegas, A., Manrique-Hernandez, R., Alvarez-Varela, E. & Restrepo-Serna, C. Effect of removable functional appliances on mandibular length in patients with class II with retrognathism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 17, 1–9 (2017).
Koretsi, V., Zymperdikas, V. F., Papageorgiou, S. N. & Papadopoulos, M. A. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Orthod. 37, 418–434 (2015).
Franchi, L., Pavoni, C., Faltin, K., McNamara, J. A. & Cozza, P. Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 83, 334–340 (2013).
Batista, K. B., Thiruvenkatachari, B., Harrison, J. E. & O’Brien, K. D. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4 (2018).
Hourfar, J., Lisson, J. A., Gross, U., Frye, L. & Kinzinger, G. S. M. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients. Clin. Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2177-0 (2017).
Morris, D. O., Illing, H. M. & Lee, R. T. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II—The soft tissues. Eur. J. Orthod. 20, 663–684 (1998).
Tepedino, M. et al. Soft-tissue changes after Class II malocclusion treatment using the Sander bite-jumping appliance: A retrospective study. Minerva Stomatol. 68, 118–125 (2019).
Paduano, S., Rongo, R., Bucci, R., Carvelli, G. & Cioffi, I. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Eur. J. Orthod. 42, 144–150 (2020).
Von Bremen, J., Erbe, C., Pancherz, H. & Ruf, S. Veränderungen der Profilattraktivität bei erwachsenen Patienten durch Behandlung mit einer Herbstapparatur. J. Orofac. Orthop. 75, 167–174 (2014).
de Rego, M. V. N. N., Martinez, E. F., Coelho, R. M. I., Leal, L. M. P. & Thiesen, G. Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 151, 559–564 (2017).
Molina de Paula, E. C., de Castro Ferreira Conti, A. C., Siqueira, D. F., Valarelli, D. P. & de Almeida-Pedrin, R. R. Esthetic perceptions of facial silhouettes after treatment with a mandibular protraction appliance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 151, 311–316 (2017).
Czarnecki, S. T., Nanda, R. S. & Currier, G. F. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 104, 180–187 (1993).
Sloss, E. A. C. et al. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 133, 509–514 (2008).
Baccetti, T., Franchi, L. & McNamara, J. A. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin. Orthod. 11, 119–129 (2005).
Howells, D. J. & Shaw, W. C. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am. J. Orthod. 88, 402–408 (1985).
Genecov, J. S., Sinclair, P. M. & Dechow, P. C. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod. 60, 191–198 (1990).
Mergen, J. L. et al. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 2. Profile silhouette evaluation. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 125, 457–462 (2004).
Ng, D., De Silva, R. K., Smit, R., De Silva, H. & Farella, M. Facial attractiveness of skeletal Class II patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery as perceived by people with different backgrounds. Eur. J. Orthod. 35, 515–520 (2013).
de Almeida-Pedrin, R. R., Guimarães, L. B. M., de Almeida, M. R., de Almeida, R. R. & Ferreira, F. P. C. Assessment of facial profile changes in patients treated with maxillary premolar extractions. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 17, 131–137 (2012).
Cox, N. H. & van der Linden, F. P. G. M. Facial harmony. Am. J. Orthod. 60, 175–183 (1971).
Shelly, A. et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 117, 630–637 (2000).
Fabré, M., Mossaz, C., Christou, P. & Kiliaridis, S. Orthodontists’ and laypersons’ aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Eur. J. Orthod. 31, 443–448 (2009).
Pişiren, A. B., Arman-Özçırpıcı, A. & Tunçer, N. İ. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on profile esthetics: A survey study. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 46, 628–634 (2018).
Mejia-Maidl, M., Evans, C. A., Viana, G., Anderson, N. K. & Giddon, D. B. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod. 75, 953–958 (2005).
Nguyen, D. D. & Turley, P. K. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 114, 208–217 (1998).
Courtney, M. D. & Leigh, T. J. Evidence-based orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 120, 18A-19A (2001).
Trenouth, M. J. Design flaws in some randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 135, 141 (2009).