Home Dental Radiology Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar extractions

Efficacy of secondary vs primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar extractions

by adminjay


    • Kunkel M.
    • Morbach T.
    • Kleis W.
    • Wagner W.

    Third molar complications requiring hospitalization.

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 300-306

  • The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard.

    Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 1554-1559

    • Bouloux G.F.
    • Steed M.B.
    • Perciaccante V.J.

    Complications of third molar surgery.

    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2007; 19 (): 117-128

    • Carrasco-Labra A.
    • Brignardello-Petersen R.
    • Yanine N.
    • Araya I.
    • Guyatt G.

    Secondary versus primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications following removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: e441-e457

    • Balamurugan R.
    • Zachariah T.

    Comparison of primary and secondary closure with a buccal mucosal-advancement flap on postoperative course after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

    Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 24: 37-43

    • Chaudhary M.
    • Singh M.
    • Singh S.
    • Singh S.P.
    • Kaur G.

    Primary and secondary closure technique following removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study.

    Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 3: 10-14

    • Singh N.
    • Kumar M.
    • Singh S.
    • Srivastava A.S.R.

    Primary closure versus secondary closure after third molar surgery: a comparative evaluation of postooperative sequelae.

    Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol. 2020; 5: A52-A55

    • Menziletoglu D.
    • Guler A.Y.
    • Basturk F.
    • Isik B.K.

    Comparison of surgical drain placement with use of kinesiologic tape on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus in impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 78: 1919.e1-1919.e7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.023

    • Nayak S.S.
    • Arora A.
    • Shah A.
    • Sanghavi A.
    • Kamath A.T.
    • Nayak V.S.

    The Influence of the suture-less anterior releasing incision in a triangular flap design on postoperative healing following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020; 10: 262-268

    • Santosh B.S.
    • Shivamurthy D.M.
    • Shilpa I.G.
    • Thippeswammy S.H.
    • Singh J.R.
    • Mangalekar S.B.

    Comparison of pain, swelling and trismus in the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars by following two different flap techniques.

    J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2016; 4: 139-142

    • Elo J.A.
    • Sun HH (Brian)
    • Dong F.
    • Tandon R.
    • Singh H.M.

    Novel incision design and primary flap closure reduces the incidence of alveolar osteitis and infection in impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 122: 124-133

    • Liberati A.
    • Altman D.G.
    • Tetzlaff J.
    • et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

    PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000100https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

    • Page M.J.
    • McKenzie J.E.
    • Bossuyt P.M.
    • et al.

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

    BMJ. 2021; 372: n71https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

  • Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, eds. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, Updated March 2011. Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Accessed June 9, 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

  • Higgins JPT, Eldridge S, Li T, eds. Chapter 23: including variants on randomized trials. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. Updated February 2021. Cochrane Collaboration; 2021. Accessed June 9, 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-23

  • Higgins JPT, Li T, Deeks JJ, eds. Chapter 6: choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. Updated February 2021. Cochrane Collaboration; 2021. Accessed June 9, 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-06

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Vist G.E.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

    BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Kunz R.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 7: rating the quality of evidence: inconsistency.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1294-1302

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Kunz R.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 6: rating the quality of evidence: imprecision.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1283-1293

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Kunz R.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    GRADE guidelines, 8: rating the quality of evidence: indirectness.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1303-1310

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Montori V.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 5: rating the quality of evidence: publication bias.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 1277-1282

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Vist G.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 4: rating the quality of evidence: study limitations (risk of bias).

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 407-415

    • Zeng L.
    • Brignardello-Petersen R.
    • Hultcrantz M.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 137: 163-175

    • Bodian C.A.
    • Freedman G.
    • Hossain S.
    • Eisenkraft J.B.
    • Beilin Y.

    The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients.

    Anesthesiology. 2001; 95: 1356-1361

    • Dawdy J.
    • Halladay J.
    • Carrasco-Labra A.
    • Araya I.
    • Yanine N.
    • Brignardello-Petersen R.

    Efficacy of adjuvant laser therapy in reducing postsurgical complications after the removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review update and meta-analysis.

    JADA. 2017; 148 (): 887-902

  • Effect of Surgical Tube Drain with Primary Closure Technique After the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: a Clinical Study. Master’s thesis.

    Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science,
    2006

    • Singh G.
    • Gaur A.
    • Mishra M.
    • Mahesh C.
    • Aurora J.K.
    • Gupta P.

    Comparative evaluation of primary and secondary closure after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol. 2014; 26: 133-137

    • Handa A.
    • Agwani K.M.
    • Surendra S.S.
    • Rana S.S.
    • Agrawal A.
    • Kapadiya M.

    Effects of tube drain with primary C-closure techniques on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016; 15: 92-100

    • Anighoro E.O.
    • Gbotolorun O.M.
    • Adewole R.A.
    • Arotiba G.T.
    • Effiom O.A.

    Assessment of the effect of wound closure technique on postoperative sequaele and complications after impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

    Open J Stomatol. 2013; 03: 527-532

  • The effects of primary and secondary wound closure following surgical extraction of lower third molars on post-operative morbidity: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

    J Dent Oral Hyg. 2015; 7: 168-174

    • Khande K.
    • Saluja H.
    • Mahindra U.

    Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011; 10: 112-117

  • Effect of Primary VS. Secondary wound closure technique after removal of impacted mandibular third molars on post-operative sequelae and incidence of distal caries in second molars associated with impacted molars.

    Acta Scientific Dent Sci. 2017; 1: 19-22

    • Kakadia U.
    • Patel K.
    • Kumar K.V.A.
    • Khare G.
    • Patel N.

    A comparative study of primary versus secondary closure after removal of lower third molar.

    Int J Clin Dent Sci. 2013; 4: 16-22

  • Evaluation of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reducing postsurgical sequelae of third molar removal.

    Avicenna J Clin Med. 2003; 10: 25-29

  • Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery.

    Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 12: 29-33

  • Virang P. Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012; 11: 276-283

    • Mahat A.K.
    • Yadav R.
    • Yadav A.K.
    • et al.

    A comparative study of the effect of sutureless versus multiple sutures technique on complications following third molar surgery in Nepalese subpopulation.

    Int J Dent. 2020; 2020: 1-6

  • Comparing the effect of different suture techniques on the post operative morbidity after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a randomized clinical study. 2018.

  • The influence of closure or dressing of third molar sockets on post-operative swelling and pain.

    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984; 22: 65-71

    • Katz M.S.
    • Peters F.
    • Elvers D.
    • et al.

    Effect of drain application on postoperative complaints after surgical removal of impacted wisdom teeth: a randomized observer-blinded split-mouth clinical trial.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 345-353

    • Akota I.
    • Alvsaker B.
    • Bjørnland T.

    The effect of locally applied gauze drain impregnated with chlortetracycline ointment in mandibular third-molar surgery.

    Acta Odontol Scand. 1998; 56: 25-29

    • Cerqueira P.R.F.
    • Vasconcelos BC do E.
    • Bessa-Nogueira R.V.

    Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 57-61

    • Danda A.K.
    • Krishna Tatiparthi M.
    • Narayanan V.
    • Siddareddi A.

    Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling: a comparative and split mouth study.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 309-312

    • Hashemi H.M.
    • Beshkar M.
    • Aghajani R.

    The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 50: 256-258

    • Korkmaz Y.T.
    • Mollaoglu N.
    • Ozmeriç N.

    Does laterally rotated flap design influence the short-term periodontal status of second molars and postoperative discomfort after partially impacted third molar surgery?.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73: 1031-1041

    • Koyuncu B.Ö.
    • Zeytinoğlu M.
    • Tetik A.
    • Gomel M.M.

    Effect of tube drainage compared with conventional suturing on postoperative discomfort after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 53: 63-67

    • Rakprasitkul S.
    • Pairuchvej V.

    Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 26: 187-190

  • Effects of tube drain with primary closure technique on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molars.

    Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 143-147

    • Xavier RL de F.
    • Vasconcelos BC do E.
    • Caubi A.F.
    • Porto G.G.
    • Maurette M.A.

    Passive drainage through the vestibular oblique incision in impacted inferior third molar surgery: a preliminary study.

    Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2008; 21: 57-63

    • Gay-Escoda C.
    • Gómez-Santos L.
    • Sánchez-Torres A.
    • Herráez-Vilas J.M.

    Effect of the suture technique on postoperative pain, swelling and trismus after removal of lower third molars: a randomized clinical trial.

    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e372-e377

    • Bello S.A.
    • Olaitan A.A.
    • Ladeinde A.L.

    A randomized comparison of the effect of partial and total wound closure techniques on postoperative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: e24-e30

    • Chukwuneke F.N.
    • Oji C.
    • Saheeb D.B.

    A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37: 341-344

  • How effective is collagen resorbable membrane placement after partially impacted mandibular third molar surgery on postoperative morbidity? A prospective randomized comparative study.

    BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 126

    • Osunde O.D.
    • Saheeb B.D.
    • Adebola R.A.

    Comparative study of effect of single and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 971-976

    • Osunde O.D.
    • Adebola R.A.
    • Saheeb B.D.

    A comparative study of the effect of suture-less and multiple suture techniques on inflammatory complications following third molar surgery.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41: 1275-1279

    • Pachipulusu P.K.
    • Manjula S.

    Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 22: 261-266

    • Pasqualini D.
    • Cocero N.
    • Castella A.
    • Mela L.
    • Bracco P.

    Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34: 52-57

    • Refo’a Y.
    • Ouatik N.
    • Golchin F.
    • Mahboobi N.

    Comparing primary and secondary wound healing discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

    Gen Dent. 2011; 59: 310-313

    • Vishal
    • Khaitan T.
    • Ranjan R.
    • Sharma N.

    Primary closure after surgical extraction of mandibular third molar with or without tube drain: a prospective study.

    J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020; 9: 637-641

  • A prospective randomized clinical study of the influence of primary closure or dressing on post-operative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery.

    Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc. 2014; 20: 59-63

    • Bailey E.
    • Kashbour W.
    • Shah N.
    • Worthington H.V.
    • Renton T.F.
    • Coulthard P.

    Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 7: CD004345

    • Xu C.
    • Li L.
    • Lin L.
    • et al.

    Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 123: 91-99



  • Source link

    Related Articles