Endodontic treatment of various palatal root in maxillary molars

• Lee J.H.
• Kim K.D.
• Lee J.K.
• et al.

Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111: 785-791

• Jeong J.W.
• Zegar Z.
• Liu R.Y.
• Makins S.R.

Radiographic indications of Vertucci type V configuration in the distal root of mandibular molars: a case series.

J Endod. 2019; 45: 453-458

• Mazzi-Chaves J.F.
• Silva-Sousa YTC
• Leoni G.B.
• et al.

Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the variability and morphological features of root canal system and their ramifications.

J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 28e20190393

• Ordinola-Zapata R.
• Martins J.N.R.

Apical root canal anatomy in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars: influence of root apical shape and prevalence of apical foramina—a micro-CT study.

Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 1218-1227

• Tzeng L.-T.
• Chang M.-C.
• Chang S.-H.
• Huang C.-C.
• Chen Y.-J.
• Jeng J.-H.

Analysis of root canal system of maxillary first and second molars and their correlations by cone beam computed tomography.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2020; 119: 968-973

• Kishan K.V.
• Das D.
• Chhabra N.
• Rathore V.P.S.
• Remy V.

Management of maxillary first molar with six canals using operating microscope.

Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29: 683-686

• Shaik I.
• Bolla N.
• Dasari B.
• Bhattacharjee A.P.

Endodontic management of various canal morphologies in maxillary first molars: a series of four case reports.

Front Dent. 2019; 16: 231-238

• Martins J.N.R.
• Alkhawas M.A.M.
• Altaki Z.
• et al.

Worldwide analyses of maxillary first molar second mesiobuccal prevalence: a multicenter cone-beam computed tomographic study.

J Endod. 2018; 44: 1641-1649.e1

• Mashyakhy M.
• Chourasia H.R.
• Halboub E.
• Almashraqi A.A.
• Khubrani Y.
• Gambarini G.

Anatomical variations and bilateral symmetry of roots and root canal system of mandibular first permanent molars in Saudi Arabian population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography.

Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31: 481-486

• Jafarzadeh H.
• Javidi M.
• Zarei M.

Endodontic retreatment of a maxillary second molar with three separate buccal roots.

Aust Endod J. 2006; 32: 129-132

• Nair R.
• Khasnis S.
• Patil J.D.

Permanent maxillary first molar with three mesiobuccal canals.

Indian J Dent Res. 2019; 30: 975-977

• Fogel H.M.
• Cunha R.S.

Maxillary first molars with 2 distobuccal canals: a case series.

J Endod. 2017; 43: 1925-1928

• Nosrat A.
• Verma P.
• Hicks M.L.
• Schneider S.C.
• Behnia A.
• Azim A.A.

Variations of palatal canal morphology in maxillary molars: a case series and literature review.

J Endod. 2017; 43: 1888-1896

• Divine K.A.
• McClanahan S.B.
• Fok A.

Anatomic analysis of palatal roots of maxillary molars using micro-computed tomography.

J Endod. 2019; 45: 724-728

• Kharouf N.
• Haikel Y.
• Mancino D.

Unusual maxillary first molars with c-shaped morphology on the same patient: variation in root canal anatomy.

Case Rep Dent. 2019; 2019: 1857289

• Martins J.N.
• Quaresma S.
• Quaresma M.C.
• Frisbie-Teel J.

C-shaped maxillary permanent first molar: a case report and literature review.

J Endod. 2013; 39: 1649-1653

• Beach D.A.

CBCT use in endodontic diagnosis.

Dent Today. 2016; 35 (80, 82-83)

• Kamble A.P.
• Pawar R.R.
• Mattigatti S.
• Mangala T.M.
• Makandar S.

Cone-beam computed tomography as advanced diagnostic aid in endodontic treatment of molars with multiple canals: two case reports.

J Conserv Dent. 2017; 20: 273-277

• Todd R.

Cone beam computed tomography updated technology for endodontic diagnosis.

Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58: 523-543

• Gaêta-Araujo H.
• Nascimento E.H.L.
• Oliveira-Santos N.
• Pinheiro M.C.R.
• Coelho-Silva F.
• Oliveira-Santos C.

Influence of adjacent teeth restored with metal posts in the detection of simulated internal root resorptions using CBCT.

Int Endod J. 2020; 53: 1299-1306

• Juerchott A.
• Sohani M.
• Schwindling F.S.
• et al.

In vivo accuracy of dental magnetic resonance imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement: a feasibility study in humans.

J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47: 809-815

• Yusof N.A.M.
• Noor E.
• Reduwan N.H.
• Yusof M.

Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiograph, cone beam computed tomography, and intrasurgical linear measurement techniques for assessing furcation defects: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial.

Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25: 923-932

• Dogramaci E.J.
• Sherriff M.
• Rossi-Fedele G.
• McDonald F.

Location and severity of root resorption related to impacted maxillary canines: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation.

Aust Orthod J. 2015; 31: 49-58

• Li Manni L.
• Lecloux G.
• Rompen E.
• Aouini W.
• Shapira L.

Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: a 1-year randomized controlled trial.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31: 814-824

• Kim Y.H.
• Lee C.

Quantitative analysis of metal artifact reduction using the auto-edge counting method in cone-beam computed tomography.

Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 8872

• Flügge T.
• Ludwig U.

Fully guided implant surgery using magnetic resonance imaging: an in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31: 737-746

• Derwich M.
• Mitus-Kenig M.
• Pawlowska E.

Temporomandibular joints’ morphology and osteoarthritic changes in cone-beam computed tomography images in patients with and without reciprocal clicking: a case control study.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17

• Spin-Neto R.
• Kruse C.

Impact of motion artefacts and motion-artefact correction on diagnostic accuracy of apical periodontitis in CBCT images: an ex vivo study in human cadavers.

Int Endod J. 2020; 53: 1275-1288

• Memon A.
• Rogers I.
• Paudyal P.
• Sundin J.

Dental x-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer and meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current epidemiological evidence.

Thyroid. 2019; 29: 1572-1593

• Liao W.C.
• Tsai Y.L.
• Wang C.Y.
• et al.

Clinical and radiographic characteristics of vertical root fractures in endodontically and nonendodontically treated teeth.

J Endod. 2017; 43: 687-693

• PradeepKumar A.R.
• Shemesh H.
• van Loveren C.
• et al.

Impact of apical extent of root canal filling on vertical root fracture: a case-control study.

Int Endod J. 2019; 52: 1283-1289

• Korreman S.
• Rasch C.
• McNair H.
• et al.

The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology−European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide.

Radiother Oncol. 2010; 94: 129-144

• Ahmed H.M.A.
• Rossi-Fedele G.

Preferred reporting items for root and canal anatomy in the human dentition (PROUD 2020): a systematic review and a proposal for a standardized protocol.

Eur Endod J. 2020; 5: 159-176

• Todd R.
• Resnick S.
• Zicarelli T.
• et al.

Template-guided endodontic access.

JADA. 2021; 152: 65-70

• Akkaya N.
• Kansu O.
• Kansu H.
• Cagirankaya L.B.
• Arslan U.

Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35: 170-174

• Yeom H.G.
• Kim J.E.
• Huh K.H.
• et al.

Development of panorama resolution phantom for comprehensive evaluation of the horizontal and vertical resolution of panoramic radiography.

Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 16529

• Jeon K.J.
• Han S.-S.
• Lee C.
• Choi Y.J.
• Jung H.I.
• Kim Y.H.

Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 49: 20190467

• Terry G.L.
• Noujeim M.
• Langlais R.P.
• Moore W.S.
• Prihoda T.J.

A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016; 45: 20150159

• Wrzesień M.
• Olszewski J.

Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017; 30: 705-713

• Omer O.E.
• Al Shalabi R.M.
• Jennings M.
• Glennon J.
• Claffey N.M.

A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars.

Int Endod J. 2004; 37: 291-296

• Keles A.
• Keskin C.
• Alqawasmi R.
• Aydemir H.

Accuracy of an endoscope to detect root canal anastomoses in mandibular molar teeth: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2020; 78: 433-437

• Kapila S.D.
• Nervina J.M.

CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44: 20140282

• Patel S.

New dimensions in endodontic imaging, part 2: cone beam computed tomography.

Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 463-475

• Parker J.
• Mol A.
• Rivera E.M.
• Tawil P.

CBCT uses in clinical endodontics: the effect of CBCT on the ability to locate MB2 canals in maxillary molars.

Int Endod J. 2017; 50: 1109-1115

• Martins J.N.
• Mata A.
• Marques D.
• Anderson C.
• Caramês J.

Prevalence and characteristics of the maxillary C-shaped molar.

J Endod. 2016; 42: 383-389

• Abdelkarim A.

Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.

Dent J (Basel). 2019; 7

• Johnson K.B.
• Ludlow J.B.

Intraoral radiographs: a comparison of dose and risk reduction with collimation and thyroid shielding.

JADA. 2020; 151: 726-734

• Setzer F.C.
• Hinckley N.
• Kohli M.R.
• Karabucak B.

A survey of cone-beam computed tomographic use among endodontic practitioners in the United States.

J Endod. 2017; 43: 699-704

• Praveen B.N.
• Shubhasini A.R.
• Bhanushree R.
• Sumsum P.S.
• Sushma C.N.

Radiation in dental practice: awareness, protection and recommendations.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14: 143-148

• Ahmad I.A.
• Al-Jadaa A.

Three root canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: case reports and literature review.

J Endod. 2014; 40: 2087-2094

• Kim Y.
• Lee S.J.
• Woo J.

Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion.

J Endod. 2012; 38: 1063-1068

• Zhang R.
• Yang H.
• Yu X.
• Wang H.
• Hu T.
• Dummer P.M.H.

Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation.

Int Endod J. 2011; 44: 162-169

• Nikoloudaki G.E.
• Kontogiannis T.G.
• Kerezoudis N.P.

Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars and the incidence of the second mesiobuccal root canal in Greek population using cone-beam computed tomography.

Open Dent J. 2015; 9: 267-272

• Coelho M.S.
• Lacerda M.
• Silva M.H.C.
• Rios M.A.

Locating the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary molars: challenges and solutions.

Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018; 10: 195-202

• Martins J.N.R.
• Marques D.
• Silva E.J.N.L.
• Caramês J.
• Mata A.
• Versiani M.A.

Second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies using cone beam computed tomography.

Arch Oral Biol. 2020; 113: 104589

• Badole G.P.
• Warhadpande M.M.
• Shenoi P.R.
• Lachure C.
• Badole S.G.

A rare root canal configuration of bilateral maxillary first molar with 7 root canals diagnosed using cone-beam computed tomographic scanning: a case report.

J Endod. 2014; 40: 296-301

• Rodrigues E.
• Braitt A.H.
• Galvão B.F.
• da Silva E.J.

Maxillary first molar with 7 root canals diagnosed using cone-beam computed tomography.

Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42: 60-64

• Raghavendra S.S.
• Hindlekar A.N.
• Desai N.N.
• Vyavahare N.K.
• Napte B.D.

Endodontic management of maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed using cone beam computed tomography scanning.

Indian J Dent. 2014; 5: 152-156

• Jain D.
• Reddy S.
• Venigalla B.S.
• Kamishetty S.

Endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with six root canal systems.

J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18: 419-422

• Kottoor J.
• Velmurugan N.
• Sudha R.
• Hemamalathi S.

Maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report.

J Endod. 2010; 36: 915-921