Home Dental Radiology Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different craniofacial patterns: a CBCT study

Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different craniofacial patterns: a CBCT study

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Billings B, Helms L, Utreja A, Eckert G, Ghoneima A. Three-dimensional evaluation of molar buccolingual inclinations after orthodontic treatment using edgewise mechanics. IntOrthod. 2017;15:529–42.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Sarment D. Cone beam computed tomography: oral and maxillofacial diagnosis and applications. Iowa, USA: Wiley Blackwell; 2014.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    DA Mcgrowan B, James J, editors. The maxillary sinus and its dental implications. London, United Kingdom: Wright; 1993.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:48–56.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. DentomaxillofacRadiol. 1994;23:163–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Oz AZ, Oz AA, El H, Palomo JM. Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:25–32.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Hamdy RM, Abdel-Wahed N. Three-dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. J Adv Res. 2014;5:387–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Sharan A, Madjar D. Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. 2006;102:375–81.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Park IH, Song JS, Choi H, Kim TH, Hoon S, Lee SH, et al. Volumetric study in the development of paranasal sinuses by CT imaging in Asian: a pilot study. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol. 2010;74:1347–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Cohen O, Warman M, Fried M, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Adi M, Halperin D, et al. Volumetric analysis of the maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses: a comparative computerized tomography based study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45:96–102.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Mohlhenrich SC, Heussen N, Peters F, Steiner T, Holzle F, Modabber A. Is the maxillary sinus really suitable in sex determination? A three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinus volume and surface depending on sex and dentition. J CraniofacSurg. 2015;26:e723–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Rani SU, Rao GV, Kumar DR, Sravya T, Sivaranjani Y, Kumar MP. Age and gender assessment through three-dimensional morphometric analysis of maxillary sinus using magnetic resonance imaging. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9:46.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Barghouth G, Prior JO, Lepori D, Duvoisin B, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F. Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves. EurRadiol. 2002;12:1451–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Gulec M, Tassoker M, Magat G, Lale B, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0106.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Oksayan R, Sokucu O, Yesildal S. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography. ActaOdontolScand. 2017;75:345–9.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Kulczyk T, Przystanska A, Rewekant A, Turska-Malinska R, Czajka-Jakubowska A. Maxillary sinuses and midface in patients with cleidocranialdysostosis. Ann Anat. 2018;215:78–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Pandis N. Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2012;141:519–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Saccucci M, Cipriani F, Carderi S, Di Carlo G, D’Attilio M, Rodolfino D, et al. Gender assessment through three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinuses by means of cone beam computed tomography. Eur Rev Med PharmacolSci. 2015;19:185–93.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Oktay H. The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different orthodontic malocclusions. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 1992;102:143–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Kojima K, Oka K, Shimooka S. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes. Odontology. 2010;98:65–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Wanzeler AMV, Alves-Junior SM, Ayres L, da Costa Prestes MC, Gomes JT, Tuji FM. Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: a new approach via cone beam computerized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133:1977–84.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    AktunaBelgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;76:1493–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Urooge A, Patil BA. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus: a morphometric analysis using cone beam computed tomography. J ClinDiagn Res. 2017;11:Zc67–70.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Park JH, Tai K, Kanao A, Takagi M. Space closure in the maxillary posterior area through the maxillary sinus. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2014;145:95–102.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Oh H, Herchold K, Hannon S, Heetland K, Ashraf G, Nguyen V, et al. Orthodontic tooth movement through the maxillary sinus in an adult with multiple missing teeth. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2014;146:493–505.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Ahn NL, Park HS. Differences in distances between maxillary posterior root apices and the sinus floor according to skeletal pattern. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2017;152:811–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2003;123:690–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Kook YA, Nelson G. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2009;135:635–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Chung KR, Kim YS, Linton JL, Lee YJ. The miniplate with tube for skeletal anchorage. J ClinOrthod. 2002;36:407–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Junqueira RB, Souza-Nunes LA, Scalioni FAR, Damasceno NNL, Verner FS, Carvalho ACP, et al. Anatomical evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and maxillary sinus. Gen Dent. 2020;68:66–71.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment