Home Dental Radiology Evaluation of trabecular bone healing using fractal dimension analysis after augmentation of alveolar crests with autogenous bone grafts: a preliminary study

Evaluation of trabecular bone healing using fractal dimension analysis after augmentation of alveolar crests with autogenous bone grafts: a preliminary study

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Stavropoulos A, Becker J, Capsius B, Açil Y, Wagner W, Terheyden H. Histological evaluation of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5-coated β-tricalcium phosphate: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(10):966–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Schmitt CM, Doering H, Schmidt T, Lutz R, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Histological results after maxillary sinus augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and autologous bone. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(5):576–85.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Pauwels R, Nackaerts O, Bellaiche N, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, et al. Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. British J Radiol. 2013;86(1021):20120135.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Licata A. Bone density vs bone quality: what’s a clinician to do? Clevel Clin J Med. 2009;76(6):331–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Southard TE, Southard KA, Jakobsen JR, Hillis SL, Najim CA. Fractal dimension in radiographic analysis of alveolar process bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1996;82(5):569–76.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2001;12(1):79–84.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Pereira LAVD, Marcantonio E Jr, Wenzel A. Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation A CBCT-based analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(2):167–73.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Veltri M, Valenti R, Ceccarelli E, Balleri P, Nuti R, Ferrari M. The speed of sound correlates with implant insertion torque in rabbit bone: an in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2010;21(7):751–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Önem E, Baksı G, Soğur E. Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5).

  • 10.

    Heo M-S, Park K-S, Lee S-S, Choi S-C, Koak J-Y, Heo S-J, et al. Fractal analysis of mandibular bony healing after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol . 2002;94(6):763–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Huang C, Chen J, Chang Y, Jeng J, Chen C. A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing. Int Endod J. 2013;46(6):523–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Updike SX, Nowzari H. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes. J Periodontal Res. 2008;43(6):658–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Law AN, Bollen A-M, Chen S-K. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(12):1734–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Yasar F, Akgunlu F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(1):1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Bollen A, Taguchi A, Hujoel P, Hollender L. Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(5):270–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Demirbaş AK, Ergün S, Güneri P, Aktener BO, Boyacıoğlu H. Mandibular bone changes in sickle cell anemia: fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;106(1):e41–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Tosoni GM, Lurie AG, Cowan AE, Burleson JA. Pixel intensity and fractal analyses: detecting osteoporosis in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by using digital panoramic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2006;102(2):235–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Zeytinoğlu M, İlhan B, Dündar N, Boyacioğlu H. Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19(2):519–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Soğur E, Baksı BG, Gröndahl H-G, Şen BH. Pixel intensity and fractal dimension of periapical lesions visually indiscernible in radiographs. J Endodont . 2013;39(1):16–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    모덕경. Changes in the fractal dimension on peri-implant trabecular bone after loading: a retrospective study: Graduate School, Yonsei University; 2012.

  • 21.

    Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S. Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(6):393–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Baksi BG, Fidler A. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24(6):993–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Shrout MK, Roberson B, Potter BJ, Mailhot JM, Hildebolt CF. A comparison of 2 patient populations using fractal analysis. J Periodontol. 1998;69(1):9–13.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Torres S, Chen C, Leroux B, Lee P, Hollender L, Schubert M. Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(8):501–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Coşgunarslan A, Canger EM, Çabuk DS, Kış HC. The evaluation of the mandibular bone structure changes related to lactation with fractal analysis. Oral Radiol. 2020;36(3):238–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1999;88(5):628–35.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Esposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants.(II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(3):721.

  • 28.

    Aydın ZU, Toptaş O, Bulut DG, Akay N, Kara T, Akbulut N. Effects of root-end filling on the fractal dimension of the periapical bone after periapical surgery: retrospective study. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23(9):3645–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Parkinson I, Fazzalari N. Methodological principles for fractal analysis of trabecular bone. J Microsc. 2000;198(Pt 2):134–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Stevenson S, Li XQ, Davy DT, Klein L, Goldberg VM. Critical biological determinants of incorporation of non-vascularized cortical bone grafts. Quantification of a complex process and structure. JBJS. 1997;79(1):1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Zins JE, Whitaker LA, Enlow DH. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(6):785.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Buchman SR, Ozaki W. The ultrastructure and resorptive pattern of cancellous onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;43(1):49–56.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Nyström E, Legrell PE, Forssell Å, Kahnberg K-E. Combined use of bone grafts and implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: Postoperative evaluation by computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24(1):20–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Lundgren S, Rasmusson L, Sjöström M, Sennerby L. Simultaneous or delayed placement of titanium implants in free autogenous iliac bone grafts: histological analysis of the bone graft-titanium interface in 10 consecutive patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28(1):31–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Neukam F, Hausamen J, Handel G, Scheller H. Osseointegrated implants for the retention of restorative jaw prostheses and facial prostheses for functional and esthetic rehabilitation following tumor surgery. Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Mund-, Kiefer-und Gesichts-Chirurgie. 1989;13(5):353–6.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Heberer S, Rühe B, Krekeler L, Schink T, Nelson JJ, Nelson K. A prospective randomized split-mouth study comparing iliac onlay grafts in atrophied edentulous patients: covered with periosteum or a bioresorbable membrane. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20(3):319–26.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, Winter K, Schramm A. Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology—is it still a “gold standard”? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures. Int J Implant Dentis. 2017;3(1):23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(3):382–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Koh K-J, Park H-N, Kim K-A. Prediction of age-related osteoporosis using fractal analysis on panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42(4):231–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Alman A, Johnson L, Calverley D, Grunwald G, Lezotte D, Hokanson J. Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(5):1631–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Yasar F, Akgunlu F. Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34(5):261–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Molon RS, Paula WN, Spin-Neto R, Verzola MHA, Tosoni GM, Lia RCC, et al. Correlation of fractal dimension with histomorphometry in maxillary sinus lifting using autogenous bone graft. Brazilian Dental J. 2015;26(1):11–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles