Home Orthodontics Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities

Expert consensus on orthodontic treatment of protrusive facial deformities

by adminjay


  • Bills, D. A., Handelman, C. S. & BeGole, E. A. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod. 75, 333–339 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jayaratne, Y. S., Zwahlen, R. A., Lo, J. & Cheung, L. K. Facial soft tissue response to anterior segmental osteotomies: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 39, 1050–1058 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamel, A. M. et al. Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Prog. Orthod. 24, 22 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoyte, T., Ali, A. & Bearn, D. Prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion: a systematic review. Open J. Epidemiol. 11, 37–46 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alhammadi, M. S., Halboub, E., Fayed, M. S., Labib, A. & El-Saaidi, C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 23, 40.e41–40.e10 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ito, A. et al. Three-dimensional morphologic analysis of the maxillary alveolar bone after anterior tooth retraction with temporary anchorage devices. Angle Orthod. 93, 667–674 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, T. et al. Impact of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea on the development of class II hyperdivergent patients receiving orthodontic treatment: (a pilot study). Angle Orthod. 88, 560–566 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rajandram, R. K., Ponnuthurai, L., Mugunam, K. & Chan, Y. S. Management of bimaxillary protrusion. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 35, 23–35 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, R. et al. Long-term bone remodeling of maxillary anterior teeth with post-treatment alveolar bone defect in adult patients with maxillary protrusion: a prospective follow-up study. Prog. Orthod. 24, 36 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tawfik, M. G. Y., Izzat Bakhit, D., El Sharaby, F. A., Moustafa, Y. A. & Dehis, H. M. Evaluation of the rate of anterior segment retraction in orthodontic patients with bimaxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: a single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 92, 738–745 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vaida, L. L., Negrutiu, B. M., Zetu, I. N., Moca, A. E. & Bran, S. Substantial improvements in facial morphology through surgical-orthodontic treatment: a case report and literature review. Medicina (Kaunas) 58 (2022).

  • Al-Rokhami, R. K. et al. Proximity of upper central incisors to incisive canal among subjects with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in various facial growth patterns. Angle Orthod. 92, 529–536 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, S. P. & Verma, S. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 51, 141–142 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, R. et al. Severe skeletal bimaxillary protrusion treated with micro-implants and a self-made four-curvature torquing auxiliary: a case report. World J. Clin. Cases 9, 722–735 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alhammadi, M. S. et al. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: a systematic review. Clin. Oral. Investig. 26, 6443–6455 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, L. et al. Beyond smiles: static expressions in maxillary protrusion and associated positivity. Front. Psychol. 12, 514016 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alkan, O., Kaya, Y., Tunca, M. & Keskin, S. Changes in the gingival thickness and keratinized gingival width of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 91, 459–467 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luo, X., Huang, H., Yin, X., Shi, B. & Li, J. Functional stability analyses of maxillofacial skeleton bearing cleft deformities. Sci. Rep. 9, 4261 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Villela, H. M. Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion using intra- and extra-alveolar miniscrews associated to self-ligating brackets system. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 25, 66–84 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hong, S. Y. et al. Alveolar bone remodeling during maxillary incisor intrusion and retraction. Prog. Orthod. 20, 47 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ackerman, J. L. & Proffit, W. R. The characteristics of malocclusion: a modern approach to classification and diagnosis. Am. J. Orthod. 56, 443–454 (1969).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, R. W. et al. Relationship between surface facial dimensions and upper airway structures in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 33, 1249–1254 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moss, M. L. & Salentijn, L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am. J. Orthod. 55, 566–577 (1969).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moss, M. L. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112, 8–11 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fernandes, P., Pinto, J. & Ustrell-Torrent, J. Relationship between oro and nasopharynx permeability and the direction of facial growth. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 18, 37–40 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghorbanyjavadpour, F. & Rakhshan, V. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 155, 832–843 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansen, C., Markstrom, A. & Sonnesen, L. Specific dento-craniofacial characteristics in non-syndromic children can predispose to sleep-disordered breathing. Acta Paediatr. 111, 473–477 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoon, A. et al. A roadmap of craniofacial growth modification for children with sleep-disordered breathing: a multidisciplinary proposal. Sleep 46, zsad095 (2023).

  • Grubb, J. & Evans, C. Orthodontic management of dentofacial skeletal deformities. Clin. Plast. Surg. 34, 403–415 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiong, X. et al. Distribution of various maxilla-mandibular positions and cephalometric comparison in chinese skeletal class II malocclusions. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 21, 822–828 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mah, M., Tan, W. C., Ong, S. H., Chan, Y. H. & Foong, K. Three-dimensional analysis of the change in the curvature of the smiling line following orthodontic treatment in incisor class II division 1 malocclusion. Eur. J. Orthod. 36, 657–664 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oueis, R., Waite, P. D., Wang, J. & Kau, C. H. Orthodontic-orthognathic management of a patient with skeletal class II with bimaxillary protrusion, complicated by vertical maxillary excess: a multi-faceted case report of difficult treatment management issues. Int. Orthod. 18, 178–190 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chung, C. H. & Wong, W. W. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 122, 619–626 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. The effect of orthodontic vertical control on the changes in the upper airway size and tongue and hyoid position in adult patients with hyperdivergent skeletal class II. BMC Oral. Health 22, 532 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hourfar, J., Kinzinger, G. S. M., Frye, L. & Lisson, J. A. Outcome differences after orthodontic camouflage treatment in hypo- and hyperdivergent patients – a retrospective cephalometric investigation. Clin. Oral. Investig. 27, 7307–7318 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liaw, J. J. L. & Park, J. H. Orthodontic considerations in hypodivergent craniofacial patterns. J. World Fed. Orthod. 13, 18–24 (2024).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ning, R., Guo, J., Li, Q. & Martin, D. Maxillary width and hard palate thickness in men and women with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 159, 564–573 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ciavarella, D. et al. Correlation between dental arch form and OSA severity in adult patients: an observational study. Prog. Orthod. 24, 19 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winiarska, N. et al. Anthropometry and current aesthetic concept of the lower third of the face and lips in caucasian adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 48, 2353–2364 (2024).

  • Perinetti, G., Rosso, L., Riatti, R. & Contardo, L. Sagittal and vertical craniofacial growth pattern and timing of circumpubertal skeletal maturation: a multiple regression study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 1728712 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shakr, S., Negm, I. & Saifeldin, H. Evaluation of digital and manual orthodontic diagnostic setups in non-extraction cases using ABO model grading system: an in-vitro study. BMC Oral. Health 24, 207 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glass, T. R., Tremont, T., Martin, C. A. & Ngan, P. W. A CBCT evaluation of root position in bone, long axis inclination and relationship to the WALA Ridge. Semin. Orthod. 25, 24–35 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Raposo, R., Peleteiro, B., Paco, M. & Pinho, T. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 47, 445–455 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Formosa, J., Zou, M., Chung, C. H., Boucher, N. S. & Li, C. Mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthod. 93, 683–694 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kostic, M. et al. Correlation theory of the maxillary central incisor, face and dental arch shape in the serbian population. Medicina (Kaunas) 59, 2142 (2023).

  • Akyalcin, S., Erdinc, A. E., Dincer, B. & Nanda, R. S. Do long-term changes in relative maxillary arch width affect buccal-corridor ratios in extraction and nonextraction treatment? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 139, 356–361 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moon, C. H., Park, H. K., Nam, J. S., Im, J. S. & Baek, S. H. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 138, 51–57 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sangalli, L. et al. Proposed parameters of optimal central incisor positioning in orthodontic treatment planning: a systematic review. Korean J. Orthod. 52, 53–65 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Islam, Z. U., Shaikh, A. J. & Fida, M. Dentoalveolar heights in vertical and sagittal facial patterns. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 26, 753–757 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Linjawi, A. I., Afify, A. R., Baeshen, H. A., Birkhed, D. & Zawawi, K. H. Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28, 280–285 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yan, X., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Long, H. & Lai, W. Association of upper lip morphology characteristics with sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns: a cross sectional study. Diagnostics (Basel) 11, 1713 (2021).

  • Krishnan, V. & Davidovitch, Z. E. In: Biological mechanisms of tooth movement, 1–15 (2021).

  • Turley, P. K. Evolution of esthetic considerations in orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 374–379 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, Q. et al. Three dimensional quantitative study of soft tissue changes in nasolabial folds after orthodontic treatment in female adults. BMC Oral. Health 23, 31 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alsowaidan, M. A. et al. Airway obstruction as a cause of malocclusion: a systematic review. Pharmacophore 12, 92–97 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Q., Jia, P., Anderson, N. K., Wang, L. & Lin, J. Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod. 82, 115–121 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, J., Chen, G., Li, W., Xu, T. & Gao, X. Upper airway changes after orthodontic extraction treatment in adults: a preliminary study using cone beam computed tomography. PLoS One 10, e0143233 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rojo-Sanchis, C., Almerich-Silla, J. M., Paredes-Gallardo, V., Montiel-Company, J. M. & Bellot-Arcis, C. Impact of bimaxillary advancement surgery on the upper airway and on obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 8, 5756 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grippaudo, C. et al. Association between oral habits, mouth breathing and malocclusion. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 36, 386–394 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koletsi, D., Makou, M. & Pandis, N. Effect of orthodontic management and orofacial muscle training protocols on the correction of myofunctional and myoskeletal problems in developing dentition. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 21, 202–215 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • List, T. & Jensen, R. H. Temporomandibular disorders: old ideas and new concepts. Cephalalgia 37, 692–704 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miao, M. Z. et al. Temporomandibular joint positional change accompanies post-surgical mandibular relapse-a long-term retrospective study among patients who underwent mandibular advancement. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 21, 33–40 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lai, Y. C., Yap, A. U. & Turp, J. C. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in patients seeking orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J. Oral. Rehabil. 47, 270–280 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, M. et al. Impact of occlusal contact pattern on dental stability and oromandibular system after orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Sci. Rep. 13, 22276 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alstad, S. & Zachrisson, B. U. Longitudinal study of periodontal condition associated with orthodontic treatment in adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. 76, 277–286 (1979).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, S. et al. Dehiscence and fenestration of skeletal Class III malocclusions with different vertical growth patterns in the anterior region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 165, 423–433 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jepsen, K., Sculean, A. & Jepsen, S. Complications and treatment errors involving periodontal tissues related to orthodontic therapy. Periodontol 2000 92, 135–158 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiang, M., Hu, B., Liu, Y., Sun, J. & Song, J. Changes in airway dimensions following functional appliances in growing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 97, 170–180 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huo, B., Che, X. & Li, X. Timing of early correction of mandibular hypoplasia in skeletal class II malocclusion: a review. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 47, 11–20 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tausche, E., Luck, O. & Harzer, W. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur. J. Orthod. 26, 237–244 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elfeky, H. Y., Fayed, M. S., Alhammadi, M. S., Soliman, S. A. Z. & El Boghdadi, D. M. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by twin block functional appliance. J. Orofac. Orthop. 79, 245–258 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohamed, A. S. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of hyoid bone position in nasal and mouth breathing subjects with skeletal Class I, and Class II. BMC Oral. Health 22, 228 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cha, J. Y. et al. Outcomes of early versus late treatment of severe class II high-angle patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 156, 375–382 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gkantidis, N., Halazonetis, D. J., Alexandropoulos, E. & Haralabakis, N. B. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent class II division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected? Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 140, 346–355 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galluccio, G. et al. Comparative evaluation of esthetic and structural aspects in class II functional therapy. A case-control retrospective study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 6978 (2021).

  • Sambataro, S. et al. Comparison of cephalometric changes in Class II growing patients with increased vertical dimension after high-pull and cervical headgear treatment. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 24, 36–41 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harari, D., Redlich, M., Miri, S., Hamud, T. & Gross, M. The effect of mouth breathing versus nasal breathing on dentofacial and craniofacial development in orthodontic patients. Laryngoscope 120, 2089–2093 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Han, S. H. & Park, Y. S. Growth patterns and overbite depth indicators of long and short faces in Korean adolescents: revisited through mixed-effects analysis. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 22, 38–45 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hourfar, J., Kinzinger, G. S. M., Frye, L. & Lisson, J. A. Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation. Clin. Oral. Investig. 27, 4773–4784 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H., Jiang, L., Yi, Y., Li, H. & Lan, T. Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion. Ann. Transl. Med 10, 163 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moresca, A. H. K. et al. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes in Class II patients treated with Herbst or Forsus appliances. Angle Orthod. 90, 571–577 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, A. et al. Efficacy of a modified twin block appliance compared with the traditional twin block appliance in children with hyperdivergent mandibular retrognathia: protocol for a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 13, e071959 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, J., Min, Z., Deng, Y., Jing, D. & Zhao, Z. Assessing the impact of occlusal plane rotation on facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment: a machine learning approach. BMC Oral. Health 24, 30 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sambataro, S. et al. Changes of occlusal plane in growing patients with increased vertical dimension during class II correction by using cervical headgear. J. Craniofac. Surg. 31, 172–177 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Picchi Comar, L., Salomão, P. M. A., Martines de Souza, B. & Magalhães, A. C. Dental erosion: an overview on definition, prevalence, diagnosis and therapy. Braz. Dent. Sci. 16, 6–17 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harvold, E. P., Tomer, B. S., Vargervik, K. & Chierici, G. Primate experiments on oral respiration. Am. J. Orthod. 79, 359–372 (1981).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ishihara, Y., Kuroda, S., Sumiyoshi, K., Takano-Yamamoto, T. & Yamashiro, T. Extraction of the lateral incisors to treat maxillary protrusion: quantitative evaluation of the stomatognathic functions. Angle Orthod. 83, 341–354 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perinetti, G. & Contardo, L. Reliability of growth indicators and efficiency of functional treatment for skeletal class II malocclusion: current evidence and controversies. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 1367691 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, Y. J., Park, J. T. & Cha, J. Y. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal class II division 1: a lateral cephalometric study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 405–413 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Talass, M. F., Talass, L. & Baker, R. C. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 91, 385–394 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alkadhi, R. M., Finkelman, M. D., Trotman, C. A. & Kanavakis, G. The role of lip thickness in upper lip response to sagittal change of incisor position. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 22, 53–57 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Q. et al. Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study. Head. Face Med. 17, 30 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatami, A. & Dreyer, C. The extraction of first, second or third permanent molar teeth and its effect on the dentofacial complex. Aust. Dent. J. 64, 302–311 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haque, S., Sandler, J., Cobourne, M. T., Bassett, P. & DiBiase, A. T. A retrospective study comparing the loss of anchorage following the extraction of maxillary first or second premolars during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescent patients. J. Orthod. 44, 268–276 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Changsiripun, C. & Phusantisampan, P. Attitudes of orthodontists and laypersons towards tooth extractions and additional anchorage devices. Prog. Orthod. 18, 19 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kinzinger, G. S. & Diedrich, P. R. Biomechanics of a modified Pendulum appliance-theoretical considerations and in vitro analysis of the force systems. Eur. J. Orthod. 29, 1–7 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Byloff, F. K., Darendeliler, M. A., Clar, E. & Darendeliler, A. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: the effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends. Angle Orthod. 67, 261–270 (1997).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antonarakis, G. S. & Kiliaridis, S. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in class II malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 78, 1133–1140 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alyami, B. Full single arch distalization in class II malocclusion using subzygomatic temporary anchorage devices: a case report. Saudi J. Oral. Sci. 10, 184–188 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, Y. N. et al. Quantitative evaluation of vertical control in orthodontic camouflage treatment for skeletal class II with hyperdivergent facial type. Head. Face Med. 20, 31 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deng, J. R. et al. Evaluation of long-term stability of vertical control in hyperdivergent patients treated with temporary anchorage devices. Curr. Med. Sci. 38, 914–919 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Umemori, M., Sugawara, J., Mitani, H., Nagasaka, H. & Kawamura, H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 115, 166–174 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarver, D. M. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 380–386 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freeman, C. S., McNamara, J. A. Jr., Baccetti, T., Franchi, L. & Graff, T. W. Treatment effects of the bionator and high-pull facebow combination followed by fixed appliances in patients with increased vertical dimensions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 131, 184–195 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuhn, R. J. Control of anterior vertical dimension and proper selection of extraoral anchorage. Angle Orthod. 38, 340–349 (1968).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • LaHaye, M. B., Buschang, P. H., Alexander, R. G. & Boley, J. C. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II division 1 patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 130, 732–741 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruslin, M. et al. One-year stability of the mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation for correction of the skeletal class II malocclusion and high mandibular plane angle: dental and skeletal aspect. Biomed. J. 45, 206–214 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liou, E. J. & Chang, P. M. Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 137, 207–212 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, J., Lei, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, B. & Chen, J. Effectiveness of micro-implant in vertical control during orthodontic extraction treatment in class II adults and adolescents after pubertal growth peak: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral. Investig. 27, 2149–2162 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sendyk, M. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of dental decompensation and mandibular symphysis remodeling on orthodontic-surgical treatment of class III malocclusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 159, 175–183.e173 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Möhlhenrich, S. C. et al. Effects of different surgical techniques and displacement distances on the soft tissue profile via orthodontic-orthognathic treatment of class II and class III malocclusions. Head. Face Med. 17, 13 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tanikawa, C. & Yamashiro, T. Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients. Sci. Rep. 11, 15853 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaplan, P. A., Tu, H. K., Koment, M. A., Bennion, J. W. & Ruskin, J. D. Radiography after orthognathic surgery. Part I. Normal appearance. Radiology 167, 191–194 (1988).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prinsell, J. R. Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in a site-specific treatment approach for obstructive sleep apnea in 50 consecutive patients. Chest 116, 1519–1529 (1999).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nachmani, A. et al. Differences in craniofacial morphology between platybasic and nonplatybasic patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction and control subjects. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 162, e5–e16 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cao, J. et al. Reconstruction of dentomaxillofacial deformity secondary to mandibular defect using concomitant orthognathic surgery and fibula free flap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 151, 179–183 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muftuoglu, O. et al. Long-term evaluation of masseter muscle activity, dimensions, and elasticity after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Clin. Oral. Investig. 27, 3855–3861 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, J. Y., Hung, T. Y., Rieko, Y. & Fang, C. Y. Correcting protruding maxillary appearance through one-piece Le fort I osteotomy without premolar extraction. J. Dent. Sci. 18, 1926–1928 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Bakelen, N. B. et al. Comparison of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery: a two-year multi-center randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res 92, 1100–1105 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rohner, D., Yeow, V. & Hammer, B. Endoscopically assisted Le Fort I osteotomy. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 29, 360–365 (2001).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, C. M. et al. Changes in facial profile after modified anterior maxillary subapical osteotomy. J. Pers. Med. 12, 508 (2022).

  • Arnett, G. W., Trevisiol, L., Grendene, E., McLaughlin, R. P. & D’Agostino, A. Combined orthodontic and surgical open bite correction. Angle Orthod. 92, 161–172 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abdel-Moniem Barakat, A., Abou-ElFetouh, A., Hakam, M. M., El-Hawary, H. & Abdel-Ghany, K. M. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a computer-generated guiding device in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 42, e195–e203 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshioka, I. et al. Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radio. 115, 455–465 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Suda, N., Tominaga, N., Niinaka, Y., Amagasa, T. & Moriyama, K. Orthognathic treatment for a patient with facial asymmetry associated with unilateral scissors-bite and a collapsed mandibular arch. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 141, 94–104 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seo, Y. J., Lin, L., Kim, S. H., Chung, K. R. & Nelson, G. Strategic camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion (mandibular prognathism) using bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion and mandibular anterior subapical osteotomy. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 149, 114–126 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foushee, D. G., Moriarty, J. D. & Simpson, D. M. Effects of mandibular orthognathic treatment on mucogingival tissues. J. Periodontol. 56, 727–733 (1985).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burk, J. L., Newby, N. W., Branham, G. B. & Provencher, R. F. Surgical correction of pseudoankylosis and microgenia: report of case. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 94, 1173–1177 (1977).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, K. et al. Effect of surgery-first orthognathic approach on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 90, 723–733 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bichu, Y. M. et al. Insights into concepts, protocols, and evidence of surgery-first orthognathic approach– the journey so far. Semin. Orthod. 28, 247–257 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wei, H., Liu, Z., Zang, J. & Wang, X. Surgery-first/early-orthognathic approach may yield poorer postoperative stability than conventional orthodontics-first approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. 126, 107–116 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barone, S., Morice, A., Picard, A. & Giudice, A. Surgery-first orthognathic approach vs conventional orthognathic approach: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 122, 162–172 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shathi, F. F. et al. Evaluation of mandibular positional changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class II and class III surgery-first approach patients. J. Stomatol Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 123, 677–684 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles