Home Dental Radiology Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?

Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Vranckx M, Ockerman A, Coucke W, Claerhout E, Grommen B, Miclotte A, et al. Radiographic prediction of mandibular third molar eruption and mandibular canal involvement based on angulation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019;22:118–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars. A critical review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21:17–27.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    van der Linden W, Cleaton-Jones P, Lownie M. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars. Review of 1001 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Endod. 1995;79:142–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza’a AM. The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:613–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Garcia AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell–Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:585–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Lysell L, Rohlin M. A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:161–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Marciani RD. Complications of third molar surgery and their management. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012;20:233–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Pell GJGB. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig. 1933;39:330–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013;4:e1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Ramiro-Verdugo J, De Vicente-Corominas E, Montiel-Company JM, Gandia-Franco JL, Bellot-Arcis C. Association between third molar agenesis and craniofacial structure development. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148:799–804.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Sanchez MJ, Vicente A, Bravo LA. Third molar agenesis and craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:473–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Abu Alhaija ES, AlBhairan HM, AlKhateeb SN. Mandibular third molar space in different antero-posterior skeletal patterns. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:570–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Hassan AH. Mandibular cephalometric characteristics of a Saudi sample of patients having impacted third molars. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23:73–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Ahila SC, Sasikala C, Kumar BM, Tah R, Abinaya K. Evaluation of the correlation of ramus height, gonial angle, and dental height with different facial forms in individuals with deep bite disorders. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016;6:232–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Naeiji M, Hansson TL. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems II The vertical symmetry. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:465–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    White S, Pharoah M. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Winter G. Impacted mandibular third molars. St Louis: American Medical Book Co.; 1926.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Peterson LJ. Principles of management of impacted teeth. Louis: Mosby; 1998.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Richardson ME. The etiology and prediction of mandibular third molar impaction. Angle Orthod. 1977;47:165–72.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Behbehani F, Artun J, Thalib L. Prediction of mandibular third-molar impaction in adolescent orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:47–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42(1):400–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Gaddipati R, Ramisetty S, Vura N, Kanduri RR, Gunda VK. Impacted mandibular third molars and their influence on mandibular angle and condyle fractures—a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:1102–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Mehra A, Anehosur V, Kumar N. Impacted mandibular third molars and their influence on mandibular angle and condyle fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconst. 2019;12:291–300.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Naghipur S, Shah A, Elgazzar RF. Does the presence or position of lower third molars alter the risk of mandibular angle or condylar fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1766–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Sugiki Y, Kobayashi Y, Uozu M, Endo T. Association between skeletal morphology and agenesis of all four third molars in Japanese orthodontic patients. Odontology. 2018;106:282–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Altan ABSE, Ucdemir E, Sandalci S, Karaman AI. Dentofacial Morphology in third molar agenesis. Turkish J Orthod. 2015;28:7–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Endo T, Yoshino S, Ozoe R, Kojima K, Shimooka S. Association of advanced hypodontia and craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. Odontology. 2004;92:48–53.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Björk AJE, Palling M. Mandibular growth and third molar impaction. Acta Odont Scand. 1956;14:231–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment