Home Dental Radiology Low-radiation dose scan protocol for preoperative imaging for dental implant surgery using deep learning-based reconstruction in multidetector CT

Low-radiation dose scan protocol for preoperative imaging for dental implant surgery using deep learning-based reconstruction in multidetector CT

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Al-Ekrish AA, Al-Shawaf R, Alfaleh W, Hörmann R, Puelacher W, Widmann G. Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:280–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Al-Ekrish AA, Al-Shawaf R, Schullian P, Al-Sadhan R, Hörmann R, Widmann G. Validity of linear measurements of the jaws using ultralow-dose MDCT and the iterative techniques of ASIR and MBIR. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11:1791–801.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Hsu JT, Huang HL, Fuh LJ, Li RW, Wu J, Tsai MT, et al. Location of the mandibular canal and thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and first molar. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013: 608570.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e25–31.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Veldhoen S, Schöllchen M, Hanken H, Precht C, Henes FO, Schön G, et al. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: a comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:790–800.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Abdelkarim A. Myths and facts of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. J World Fed Orthod. 2012;1:e3–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1088–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Sakai Y, Okamura K, Kitamoto E, Kami YN, Shirasaka T, Mikayama R, et al. Improved scan method for dental imaging using multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20190462.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Lin WC, Wang HH, Hsu WL, Cao BH, Chen DJ, Tsai CJ. Investigation of an optimized scanning protocol for the dentomaxillofacial region using 320-slice multidetector computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160395.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Nagatani Y, Takahashi M, Murata K, Ikeda M, Yamashiro T, Miyara T, et al. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1401–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Yu Z, Zhou J, Lu Y, et al. Deep learning-based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:5322–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Zhou J, Yu Z, Nemoto T, Tatsugami F, et al. Deep learning reconstruction at CT: phantom study of the image characteristics. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:82–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77:397–402.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Davis AT, Palmer AL, Pani S, Nisbet A. Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med. 2018;45:59–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Ichikawa K. CTmeasure; 2012–2014. Retrieved from: http://www.jsct-tech.org/. Hiroshima: Japanese Society of CT Technology.

  • 17.

    Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G, Murphy SN, Samei E. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2012;39:4115–22.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Ichikawa K, Kawashima H, Shimada M, Adachi T, Takata T. A three-dimensional cross-directional bilateral filter for edge-preserving noise reduction of low-dose computed tomography images. Comput Biol Med. 2019;111: 103353.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G. CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med. 2012;28:161–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Valentin J, International Commission on Radiation Protection. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–79.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):55–77.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles