Little, A. C., Jones, B. C. & DeBruine, L. M. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 1638–1659 (2011).
McNamara, J. A. Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 51, 177–202 (1981).
Koretsi, V., Zymperdikas, V. F., Papageorgiou, S. N. & Papadopoulos, M. A. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Orthod. 37, 418–434 (2015).
George, S. M., Campbell, P. M., Tadlock, L. P., Schneiderman, E. & Buschang, P. H. Keys to Class II correction: A comparison of 2 extraction protocols. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 159, 333–342 (2021).
Tulloch, J. C., Proffit, W. R. & Phillips, C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 125, 657–667 (2004).
Soh, J., Sandham, A. & Chan, Y. H. Occlusal status in Asian male adults: Prevalence and ethnic variation. Angle Orthod. 75, 814–820 (2005).
Gu, Y., McNamara, J. A. Jr., Sigler, L. M. & Baccetti, T. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults. Eur. J. Orthod. 33, 205–211 (2011).
Lv, Y., Yan, B. & Wang, L. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 142, 246–255 (2012).
Tadic, N. & Woods, M. Contemporary Class II orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment: A review. Aust. Dent. J. 52, 168–174 (2007).
Wong, K. F., Chen, W., Ren, J., Yang, Y. & Lin, Y. Effects of Two-phase treatment with functional appliances followed by extraction versus one-phase treatment with extraction in Class II growing patients: A case-control study. J. Clin. Med. 11, 7428 (2022).
O’Brien, K. et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: A randomized, controlled trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 124, 128–137 (2003).
Hemmatpour, S., Mokhtar, A. & Rakhshan, V. Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on Class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method : A randomized clinical trial. J. Orofac. Orthop. 78, 41–51 (2017).
Dinçer, B., Yetkiner, E., Aras, I., Attin, T. & Attin, R. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiographs on extraction decision in skeletal Class I patients. Head Face Med. 9, 1–7 (2013).
Salehi, P., Azadeh, N., Beigi, N. & Farzin, M. Influence of age on perception of best esthetical profile. J. Dent. 20, 16 (2019).
Rocha, A. D. et al. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment. Braz. Oral Res. 34, e003 (2020).
Hockley, A., Weinstein, M., Borislow, A. J. & Braitman, L. E. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 141, 161–168 (2012).
Sloss, E. A. et al. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 133, 509–514 (2008).
O’Brien, K. et al. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 135, 573–579 (2009).
Maple, J. R., Vig, K. W., Beck, F. M., Larsen, P. E. & Shanker, S. A comparison of providers’ and consumers’ perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 128, 690–696 (2005).
Mergen, J. L. et al. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 2. Profile silhouette evaluation. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 125, 457–462 (2004).
Pozza, O. A. et al. Attractiveness of the facial profile: Comparison of Class II patients treated with Twin Force® or intermaxillary elastics. Dental Press J. Orthod. 26, e212014 (2021).
Kannan, A. & Padmanabhan, S. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue profile changes with herbst and twin block appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A perception study. Turk. J. Orthod. 35, 173 (2022).
Kiekens, R. M., Maltha, J. C., Hof van’t, M. A., Straatman, H. & Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents. Eur. J. Orthod. 30, 141–146 (2008).
Gazzani, F., Franchi, L., Lione, R., Cozza, P. & Pavoni, C. Soft tissue evaluation of functional therapy in growing patients with Class II malocclusion: A long-term study. Eur. J. Orthod. 44, 37–42 (2022).
Santori, F. et al. Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople. Sci. Rep. 11, 13989 (2021).
Paduano, S., Rongo, R., Bucci, R., Carvelli, G. & Cioffi, I. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Eur. J. Orthod. 42, 144–150 (2020).
Chew, M. T., Sandham, A., Soh, J. & Wong, H. B. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients: A subjective and objective evaluation. Angle Orthod. 77, 845–850 (2007).
Huang, Y.-P. & Li, W.-R. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 85, 690–698 (2015).
Quintão, C., Helena, I., Brunharo, V. P., Menezes, R. C. & Almeida, M. A. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy. Eur. J. Orthod. 28, 35–41 (2006).
Hayashida, H., Ioi, H., Nakata, S., Takahashi, I. & Counts, A. L. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults. Eur. J. Orthod. 33, 419–426 (2011).
Popowich, K., Nebbe, B., Heo, G., Glover, K. E. & Major, P. W. Predictors for Class II treatment duration. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 127, 293–300 (2005).
Mir, C. F. One-phase or two-phase orthodontic treatment?. Evid. Based Dent. 17, 107–108 (2016).
Buschang, P. H., Roldan, S. I. & Tadlock, L. P. Seminars in orthodontics 321–335 (Elsevier, USA, 2017).
Hoffelder, L. B., de Lima, E. M. S., Martinelli, F. L. & Bolognese, A. M. Soft-tissue changes during facial growth in skeletal Class II individuals. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 131, 490–495 (2007).
Oh, H. S. et al. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 136, 762 (2009).
Buschang, P. H., Jacob, H. & Carrillo, R. Seminars in Orthodontics 212–226 (Elsevier, USA, 2013).
Evrard, A., Tepedino, M., Cattaneo, P. M. & Cornelis, M. A. Which factors influence orthodontists in their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 11, e432 (2019).
Maaz, M. & Fida, M. Dental, skeletal, and soft-tissue changes in adult orthodontic patients treated with premolar extraction and nonextraction: A cross-sectional study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 162, 360–366 (2022).
