Home Dental Radiology Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography

Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography

by adminjay


  • Martins MG, Whaites EJ, Ambrosano GM, Haiter Neto F. What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours? Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2006;35:143–6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/29710762.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ergün S, Güneri P, İlgüy D, İlgüy M, Boyacıoğlu H. How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2009;38:42–7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/61622880.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Snel R, Van De Maele E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2018;47:20180045. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180045.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kuramoto T, Takarabe S, Okamura K, Shiotsuki K, Shibayama Y, Tsuru H, et al. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2020;49:1–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hastie T, Venske-Parker S, Aps JKM. Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021;51:137–48. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20200182.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Samei E, Bakalyar D, Boedeker KL, Brady S, Fan J, Leng S, et al. Performance evaluation of computed tomography systems: summary of AAPM task group 233. Med Phys. 2019;46:e735–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13763.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seibert JA, Bogucki T, Ciona T, Huda W, Karellas A, Mercier J, et al. Acceptance testing and quality control of photostimulable storage phosphor imaging systems [Internet]. Am. Assoc.; 2006. Phys Med. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/detail.asp?docid=94

  • Sund P, Båth M, Kheddache S, Månsson LG. Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1971-z.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, et al. (1999) Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 87:123–9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1079210499703057

  • Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T, et al. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 1999;87:115–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70304-5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaalaas L, Tyndall D, Mol A, Everett ET, Bangdiwala A. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2016;45:20150281. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150281.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Melo DP, Cruz AD, Melo SLS, De Farias JFG, Haiter-Neto F, de Almeida SM. Effect of different tube potential settings on caries detection using psp plate and conventional film. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:58–61. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12225.5845.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:413–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.021.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stamatakis HC, Yoshiura K, Shi XQ, Welander U, McDavid WD. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 1999;28:112–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600423.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshiura K, Stamatakis HC, Welander U, McDavid WD, Shi XQ, Ban S, et al. (1999) Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol Cited 2022 Jan 13; 28:224–31. http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/dmfr. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600450

  • Shiraishi J (1999). Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy: experimental design of ROC analysis. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 55:362–8. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/55/4/55_KJ00003110542/_article/-char/ja/. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.KJ00003110542

  • Weerawanich W, Shimizu M, Takeshita Y, Okamura K, Yoshida S, Yoshiura K. Cluster signal-to-noise analysis for evaluation of the information content in an image. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2018;47:1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weerawanich W, Shimizu M, Takeshita Y, Okamura K, Yoshida S, Jasa GR, et al. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography diagnostic image quality using cluster signal-to-noise analysis. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0325-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshiura K, Okamura K, Tokumori K, Nakayama E, Chikui T, Goto TK, et al. Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2005;34:350–2. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13550415.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okamura K, Yoshiura K, Tatsumi M. Image quality evaluation of intraoral digital imaging system, Digora optime. Dent Radiol. 2009;49:1–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshiura K. Image quality assessment of digital intraoral radiography – Perception to caries diagnosis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2012;48:42–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2011.09.001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yoshida S, Okamura K, Tokumori K, Shimizu M, Takeshita Y, Weerawanich W, et al. (2016) Development of a new method for evaluating radiographic image quality using just noticeable differences. Dent Radiol [Internet]; Cited 2022 Jan 10. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology; 56 27–32

  • Herbert A. ImageJ FindFoci plugins [Internet]. Brighton: University of Sussex; 2016. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/gdsc/intranet/pdfs/FindFoci.pdf.

  • Yoshiura K, Welander U, Shi XQ, Li G, Kawazu T, Tatsumi M, et al. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2001;30:219–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600607.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takeshita Y, Shimizu M, Okamura K, Yoshida S, Weerawanich W, Tokumori K, et al. A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiol. 2017;46:1–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takarabe S, Kuramoto T, Shibayama Y, Tsuru H, Tatsumi M, Kato T, et al. Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method. J Med Imag (Bellingham). 2021. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.043501.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Acchiappati D, Burani A. Performance evaluation of a direct computed radiography system by means of physical characterization and contrast detail analysis. In: Hsieh J, Flynn MJ, editors. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=https://doi.org/10.1117/12.710523; 2007. p. 65104M

  • Pizer SM, Austin JD, Perry JR, Safrit HD, Zimmerman JB. Adaptive histogram equalization for automatic contrast enhancement of medical images; 1986. Appl opt Instrum Med XIV Pict Arch Commun Syst [Internet]. In: Dwyer III SJ, Schneider RH, editors. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=https://doi.org/10.1117/12.975399. p. 242

  • Weerawanich W, Shimizu M, Takeshita Y, Okamura K, Yoshida S, Jasa GR, et al. Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:260–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0348-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles