Home Orthodontics Smile dimensions affect self-perceived smile attractiveness

Smile dimensions affect self-perceived smile attractiveness

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Grammer, K., Fink, B., Moller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol. Rev. 78, 385–407 (2003).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Gangestad, S. W., Scheyd, G. J. & Scheyd, G. J. The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34, 523–548 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Windhager, S., Schaefer, K. & Fink, B. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 23, 805–814 (2011).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Valenzano, D. R., Mennucci, A., Tartarelli, G. & Cellerino, A. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. Vis. Res. 46, 1282–1291 (2006).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Zaidel, D., Aarde, S. & Baig, K. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain Cognit. 57, 261–263 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    O’Dogherty, J. et al. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 41, 147–155 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Talamas, S. N., Mavor, K. I., Axelsson, J., Sundelin, T. & Perrett, D. I. Eyelid-openness and mouth curvature influence perceived intelligence beyond attractiveness. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 603–620 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Furl, N., Gallagher, S. & Averbeck, B. B. A selective emotional decision-making bias elicited by facial expressions. PLoS ONE 7, e33461 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Pausch, N. C. & Katsoulis, D. Gender-specific evaluation of variation of maxillary exposure when smiling. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 45, 913–920 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Otta, E., Abrosio, F. & Hoshino, R. Reading a smiling face: messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Percept. Motor Skills 82, 1111–1121 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Wang, Z., He, X. & Liu, F. Examining the effect of smile intensity on age perceptions. Psychol. Rep. 117, 188–205 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Van der Geld, P., Oosterveld, P., Van Heck, G. & Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M. Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod. 77, 759–765 (2007).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Andijani, R. I. & Tatakis, D. N. Hypermobile upper lip is highly prevalent among patients seeking treatment for gummy smile. J. Periodontol. 90(3), 256–262 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Jaspers, G. W. C., Pijpe, J. & Jansma, J. The use of botulinum toxin type A in cosmetic facial procedures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 40(2), 127–133 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Pabari, S., Moles, D. R. & Cunningham, S. J. Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 140(6), e263–e272 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Arnett, G. & Bergman, R. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning-Part II . Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 103, 395–411 (1993).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Sriphadungporn, C. & Chamnannidiadha, N. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages. Prog. Orthod. 18, 8 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Hata, K. & Arai, K. Dimensional analyses of frontal posed smile attractiveness in Japanese female patients. Angle Orthod. 86, 127–134 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Pan, B., Yu, L., Wu, D. & Tang, L. Systematic errors in two-dimensional digital image correlation due to lens distortion. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51, 140–147 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Farkas, L. G., Bryson, W. & Klotz, J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 66, 346–355 (1980).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Muradin, M. S. M., Rosenberg, A., van der Bilt, A., Stoelinga, P. J. W. & Koole, R. The reliability of frontal facial photographs to assess changes in nasolabial soft tissues. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 36, 728–734 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Brons, S. et al. Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 7, e41898 (2012).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Metzler, P. et al. Craniofacial landmarks in young children: how reliable are measurements based on 3-dimensional imaging?. J. Craniofac. Surg. 23, 1790–1795 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Heike, C. L., Cunningham, M. L., Hing, A. V., Stuhaug, E. & Starr, J. R. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 124, 1261–1272 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Kook, M. S. et al. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 42, 648–656 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Lübbers, H. T. et al. The influence of involuntary facial movements on craniofacial anthropometry: a survey using a three-dimensional photographic system. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 50, 171–175 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Aitken, R. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 62, 989–993 (1969).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Pachêco-Pereira, C. et al. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 86, 495–508 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Pachêco-Pereira, C., Pereira, J. R., Dick, B. D., Perez, A. & Flores-Mir, C. Factors associated with patient and parent satisfaction after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 652–659 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Godinho, J., Goncalves, R. P. & Jardim, L. Contribution of facial components to the attractiveness of the smiling face in male and female patients: a cross-sectional correlation study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 157, 98–104 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    McNamara, L., McNamara, J. A., Ackerman, M. B. & Baccetti, T. Hard- and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 133, 491–499 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Schabel, B. J., Franchi, L., Baccetti, T. & McNamara, J. A. Subjective versus objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 135, S72–S79 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Rogers, S. L., Speelman, C. P., Guidetti, O. & Longmuir, M. Using dual eye tracking to uncover personal gaze patterns during social interaction. Sci. Rep. 8, 4271 (2018).

    ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Souccar, N. M. et al. Smile dimensions in adult African American and Caucasian females and males. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 22(Suppl. 1), 186–191 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Sawyer, A. R., See, M. & Nduka, C. Quantitative analysis of normal smile with 3D stereophotogrammetry: an aid to facial reanimation. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 63, 65–72 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Sforza, C. et al. The effect of age and sex on facial mimicry: a three-dimensional study in healthy adults. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 39, 990–999 (2010).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Gibelli, D. et al. 3D analysis of smiling function in healthy people: influence of sex and age. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 73, 184–199 (2020).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Ellis, L. & Das, S. Sex differences in smiling and other photographed traits: a theoretical assessment. J. Biosoc. Sci. 43, 345–351 (2011).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Henley, N. M. Status and sex: some touching observations. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 2, 91–93 (1973).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Deutsch, F. Status, sex, and smiling: the effect of role on smiling in men and women. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 16, 531–540 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Dodd, D., Russell, B. & Jenkins, C. Smiling in school yearbook photos: gender differences from kindergarten to adulthood. Psychol. Rec. 49, 543–551 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Cashdan, E. Hormones, sex, and status in women. Horm. Behav. 29, 354–366 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Dabbs, J. M. Jr., Hargrove, M. F. & Heusel, C. Testosterone differences among college fraternities: well-behaved versus rambunctious. Pers. Ind. Differ. 20, 157–161 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Hönn, M., Dietz, K., Eiselt, M.-L. & Göz, G. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education. J. Orofac. Orthop. 69, 20–30 (2008).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Falkensammer, F., Loesch, A., Krall, C., Weiland, F. & Freudenthaler, J. The impact of education on the perception of facial profile aesthetics and treatment need. Aesthet. Plast. Surg. 38, 620–631 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Wernick, M. & Manaster, G. Age and the perception of age and attractiveness. Gerontologist. 24, 408–414 (1984).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Bonetti, G. A., Alberti, A., Sartini, C. & Parenti, S. I. Patients’ self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs. Angle Orthod. 81, 517–524 (2011).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Lin, Y. et al. A novel three-dimensional smile analysis based on dynamic evaluation of facial curve contour. Sci. Rep. 6, 22103. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22103 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment