Home Dental Radiology The effects of orthodontic materials on the accuracy of periapical radiography-based caries detection

The effects of orthodontic materials on the accuracy of periapical radiography-based caries detection

by adminjay


  • 1.

    van Dorp CS, Exterkate RA, ten Cate JM. The effect of dental probing on subsequent enamel demineralization. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988;55(5):343–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(10):1413–26.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42(4):297–304.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Chong MJ, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Cheng E, Wan V. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(4):341–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Rodrigues JA, Diniz MB, Josgrilberg EB, Cordeiro RC. In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(4):501–6.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Ucok O, Yuksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(8):501–11.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Shi XQ, Li G. Detection accuracy of approximal caries by black-and-white and color-coded digital radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):433–6.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Goel A, Chawla HS, Gauba K, Goyal A. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27(4):227–34.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Li G, Qu XM, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by digital radiographs: an in vivo and in vitro comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(3):463–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Anbiaee N, Mohassel AR, Imanimoghaddam M, Moazzami SM. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11(6):E025–32.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    dos Anjos PA, de Melo DP, Pontual ML, de Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F. Comparative study of a wireless digital system and 2 PSP digital systems on proximal caries detection and pixel values. Gen Dent. 2013;61(6):56–60.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Zhang ZL, Qu XM, Li G, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(1):103–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Hintze H, Wenzel A. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994;23(1):19–23.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27(1):3–11.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim JS. Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35(12):850–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology 1. Radiology. 2003;229(1):3–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Junqueira RB, Verner FS, Campos CN, Devito KL, do Carmo AM. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2013;39(12):1620–4.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley J, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(2):206–10.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Salineiro FC, Gialain IO, Kobayashi-Velasco S, Pannuti CM, Cavalcanti MG. Detection of furcation involvement using periapical radiography and 2 cone-beam computed tomography imaging protocols with and without a metallic post: an animal study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47(1):17–24.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Boas FE, Fleischmann D. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. Radiology. 2011;259(3):894–902.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod. 2009;35(5):719–22.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Sousa Melo SL, Belem MDF, Prieto LT, Tabchoury CPM, Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124(3):306–14.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Prell D, Kyriakou Y, Struffert T, Dorfler A, Kalender WA. Metal artifact reduction for clipping and coiling in interventional C-arm CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(4):634–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Valizadeh S, Tavakkoli MA, Karimi Vasigh H, Azizi Z, Zarrabian T. Evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system: comparison with intraoral periapical radiography in proximal caries detection. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012;6(1):1–5.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Benn DK. Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994;23(2):69–72.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Kang BC, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82(4):459–65.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Hintze H, Wenzel A. Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning. Caries Res. 2003;37(2):115–24.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment