Home Dental Radiology Tomographic evaluation of buccal bone in different skeletal patterns and incisors inclination

Tomographic evaluation of buccal bone in different skeletal patterns and incisors inclination

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006. p. 84–5.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Han JY, Jung GU. Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011;41:60–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti TD, Addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2012;83:187–97.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Zhou Z, Chen W, Shen M, Sun C, Li J, Chen N. Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of alveolar bone anatomy at the maxillary anterior region in Chinese adults. J Biomed Res. 2013;28:498.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1123–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Nahm KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, Choi YS, Kook YA, Kim SH, et al. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone-beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:481–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Yagci A, Veli İ, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S, et al. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:67–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Al-Masri MMN, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Eed MS. Evaluation of bone thickness and density in the lower incisors’ region in adults with different types of skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:630–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, Lv P, Cao YM, Yu M, Yue Y. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:245–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Ferreira PP, Torres M, Campos PSF, Vogel CJ, De Araújo TM, Rebello IMCR. Evaluation of buccal bone coverage in the anterior region by cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144:698–704.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1953;39:729–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Tweed CH. Clinical orthodontics, vol. 2. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1966. p. 697.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Timock AM, Cook V, Mcdonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140:734–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Kamburoğlu K, Kurşun Ş, Kiliç C, Özen T. Accuracy of virtual models in the assessment of maxillary defects. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45:23–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Cook VC, Timock AM, Crowe JJ, Wang M, Covell DA. Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone-beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18:127–36.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Nahás-Scocate ACR, De Siqueira BA, Patel MP, Lipiec-Ximenez ME, Chilvarquer I, Do Valle-Corotti KM. Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:279–85.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Staudt CB, Kiliaridis S. Different skeletal types underlying Class III malocclusion in a random population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:715–21.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Al-Khateeb EA, Al-Khateeb SN. Anteroposterior and vertical components of class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:859–86.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;37:109–19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:573–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Kolsuz ME, Bagis N, Orhan K, Avsever H, Demiralp KÖ. Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20150070.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    De-Azevedo-Vaz SL, Vasconcelos KF, Neves FS, Melo SLS, Campos PSF, Haiter-Neto F. Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence using two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a CBBT device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:121–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Menezes CCD, Janson G, Massaro CDS, Cambiaghi L, Garib DG. Reproducibility of bone plate thickness measurements with cone-beam computed tomography using different image acquisition protocols. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15:143–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G, Wang B, Fang B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;147:313–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Torres MGG, Campos PSF. Segundo NPN, Ribeiro M, Navarro M, Crusoé-Rebello I Avaliação de doses referenciais obtidas com exames de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico adquiridos com diferentes tamanhos de voxel. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15:42–3.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Evangelista K, de Faria VK, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Silva MAG. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138:133-e1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment