Shah JP, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer—surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:394–401.
Geets X, Daisne JF, Arcangeli S, et al. Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:25–31.
Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1424–9.
Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology. 2005;237:945–51.
Toepker M, Moritz T, Krauss B, et al. Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e398-405.
Stiller W, Schwarzwaelder CB, Sommer CM, et al. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:1405–12.
Yeh BM, Shepherd JA, Wang ZJ, et al. Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen. Am J Radiol. 2009;193:47–54.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Chandarana H, et al. Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:13–23.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology. 2009;252:433–40.
Graser A, Becker CR, Staehler M, et al. Single-phase dual-energy CT allows for characterization of renal masses as benign or malignant. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:399–405.
Ascenti G, Krauss B, Mazziotti S, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in renal masses: nonlinear versus linear blending. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:1186–93.
De Cecco CN, Buffa V, Fedeli S, et al. Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2870–5.
Robinson E, Babb J, Chandarana H, et al. Dual source dual energy MDCT: comparison of 80 kVp and weighted average 120 kVp data for conspicuity of hypo-vascular liver metastases. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:413–8.
Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Razek AA, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of dualenergy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120 kVp acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1994–9.
Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Bauer RW, et al. Dual-energy CT of head and neck cancer: average weighting of low- and high-voltage acquisitions to improve lesion delineation and image quality-initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:306–11.
Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Goetti R, et al. Low Kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1014–9.
Toepker M, Czerny C, Ringl H, et al. Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer? Oral Oncol. 2014;50:221–7.
D’Angelo T, Cicero G, Mazziotti S, et al. Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20180546.
Schmoee J, Dirrichs T, Fehrenbacher K, et al. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI+) in dual-source dual-energy CT venography (DSDE-CTV) of the lower extremity prior to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG): a feasibility study. Acad Radiol. 2020;27:1249–1254.
Foti G, Beltramello A, Minerva G, et al. Identification of residual–recurrent cholesteatoma in operated ears: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT and MRI. Radiol Med. 2019;124:478–86.
Lawrence S, Saskia L, Elisabeth V, et al. RECIST 1.1–update and clarification: from the RECIST Committee. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:132–7.