Critical A-P spread.
Implant Soc. 1990; 1: 2-3
Forces and moments on Brånemark implants.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 241-247
Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated implants.
in: Hobo S. Ichida E. Garcia L. Osseiointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing,
Tokyo, Japan1989: 265-280
in: Misch C.E. Dental Implant Prosthetics. Elsevier Mosby,
St. Louis, MO2005: 168
Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts.
Quintessence Int. 1989; 20: 473-480
The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study, part III—problems and complications encountered.
J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64: 185-194
Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 331-339
A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.
Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416
Ratios of cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of definitive hybrid full-arch, screw-retained prostheses: results of a clinical study.
J Prosthodont. 2018; 27: 402-408
Implant superstructures: a comparison of ultimate failure force.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 35-39
Tissue Integrated Prostheses.
Chicago, IL1985: 51-70 ()
Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 23-26
Laboratory Techniques for the Brånemark System.
Chicago, IL1990 ()
Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.
Clin Mater. 1992; 10: 153-201
Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems.
J Oral Implantol. 1991; 17: 40-47
Alternative prosthodontic technique for tissue-integrated prostheses.
J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 198-204
A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses, part II: prosthetic aspects.
J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 949-956
Micro-computed tomography assessment of human alveolar bone: bone density and three-dimensional micro-architecture.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 307-313
Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses.
J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49: 843-848
Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 525-531
Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: ZE16-ZE19
Free-end pontics used on fixed partial dentures.
J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 20: 120-138
Indications for splinting implant restorations.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 1642-1652
Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21: 51-58
Vertical and horizontal dimensions of implant dentistry: numbers every dentist should know.
Inside Dent. 2009; ()
Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses.
J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59: 59-63
Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 155-163
Comparison of marginal bone loss and implant success between axial and tilted implants in maxillary all-on-4 treatment concept rehabilitations after 5 years of follow-up.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 849-859
Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function.
J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31: 1077-1083
Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 983-990
Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants.
Periodontology 2000. 1994; 4: 23-40
The mechanics of dental structures.
JADA. 1952; 44: 187-193
Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature, part 1.
J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 41-46
The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987; 2: 77-84
Complications with osseointegrated implants.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 581-585
Theoretical assessment of cross sections for cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.
J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 23-30
Biomechanical concerns with fixed partial dentures involving implants.
Implant Dent. 1993; 2: 221-242
Modifications in the design and fabrication of mandibular osseointegrated fixed prostheses frameworks.
J Prosthodont. 1995; 4: 82-89
Alternative prosthodontic superstructure designs.
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1985; 28: 71-75
Cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of interim, acrylic resin, full-arch screw-retained prostheses and their relationship to prosthetic complications.
J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 502-507
Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature, part 2.
J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 114-118
Overdenture design to maximize stability and function.
Dent Today. 2017; 36: 108-112
Implant-supported overdenture: a review.
J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2017; 07: 270-277
Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines.
JADA. 2010; 141: 1221-1230
Brunski J. Biomechanics.
in: Worthington P. Lang B.R. Rubenstein J.E. Osseointegration in Dentistry. 2nd ed. Quintessence,
Hanover Park, IL2003: 49-84