Home Dental Radiology Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis

Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis

by adminjay


  • Critical A-P spread.

    Implant Soc. 1990; 1: 2-3

    • Rangert B.
    • Jemt T.
    • Jörneus L.

    Forces and moments on Brånemark implants.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 241-247

  • Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated implants.

    in: Hobo S. Ichida E. Garcia L. Osseiointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing,
    Tokyo, Japan1989: 265-280

    • Misch C.E.
    • Misch-Dietsh F.

    Preimplant prosthodontics.

    in: Misch C.E. Dental Implant Prosthetics. Elsevier Mosby,
    St. Louis, MO2005: 168

  • Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts.

    Quintessence Int. 1989; 20: 473-480

  • The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study, part III—problems and complications encountered.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64: 185-194

    • McAlarney M.E.
    • Stavropoulos D.N.

    Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 331-339

    • Adell R.
    • Lekholm U.
    • Rockler B.
    • Brånemark P.I.

    A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.

    Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416

  • Ratios of cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of definitive hybrid full-arch, screw-retained prostheses: results of a clinical study.

    J Prosthodont. 2018; 27: 402-408

    • McGlumphy E.A.
    • Robinson D.M.
    • Mendel D.A.

    Implant superstructures: a comparison of ultimate failure force.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7: 35-39

    • Brånemark P.I.
    • Zarb G.A.
    • Albrektsson T.

    Tissue Integrated Prostheses.

    Quintessence,
    Chicago, IL1985: 51-70 ()

    • Shackleton J.R.
    • Carr L.
    • Slabbert J.C.
    • Becker P.J.

    Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 23-26

  • Laboratory Techniques for the Brånemark System.

    Quintessence,
    Chicago, IL1990 ()

  • Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.

    Clin Mater. 1992; 10: 153-201

  • Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems.

    J Oral Implantol. 1991; 17: 40-47

  • Alternative prosthodontic technique for tissue-integrated prostheses.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57: 198-204

    • Naert I.
    • Quirynen M.
    • van Steenberghe D.
    • Darius P.

    A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses, part II: prosthetic aspects.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 949-956

  • Micro-computed tomography assessment of human alveolar bone: bone density and three-dimensional micro-architecture.

    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 307-313

  • Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49: 843-848

    • Ogawa T.
    • Dhaliwal S.
    • Naert I.
    • et al.

    Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.

    J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 525-531

    • Taruna M.
    • Chittaranjan B.
    • Sudheer N.
    • Tella S.
    • Abusaad M.

    Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants.

    J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8: ZE16-ZE19

    • Schweitzer J.M.
    • Schweitzer R.D.
    • Schweitzer J.

    Free-end pontics used on fixed partial dentures.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 20: 120-138

    • Grossmann Y.
    • Finger I.M.
    • Block M.S.

    Indications for splinting implant restorations.

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 1642-1652

    • Celebi A.A.
    • Keklik H.
    • Tan E.
    • Ucar F.I.

    Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.

    Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21: 51-58

  • Vertical and horizontal dimensions of implant dentistry: numbers every dentist should know.

    Inside Dent. 2009; ()

    • Lindquist L.W.
    • Rockler B.
    • Carlsson G.E.

    Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59: 59-63

    • Ahlqvist J.
    • Borg K.
    • Gunne J.
    • Nilson H.
    • Olsson M.
    • Astrand P.

    Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 155-163

    • Hopp M.
    • de Araújo Nobre M.
    • Maló P.

    Comparison of marginal bone loss and implant success between axial and tilted implants in maxillary all-on-4 treatment concept rehabilitations after 5 years of follow-up.

    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 849-859

    • Wennström J.
    • Zurdo J.
    • Karlsson S.
    • Ekestubbe A.
    • Gröndahl K.
    • Lindhe J.

    Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function.

    J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31: 1077-1083

    • Hälg G.A.
    • Schmid J.
    • Hämmerle C.H.

    Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.

    Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 983-990

  • Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants.

    Periodontology 2000. 1994; 4: 23-40

  • The mechanics of dental structures.

    JADA. 1952; 44: 187-193

    • Rodriguez A.M.
    • Aquilino S.A.
    • Lund P.S.

    Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature, part 1.

    J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 41-46

    • Worthington P.
    • Bolender C.L.
    • Taylor T.D.

    The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period.

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987; 2: 77-84

  • Complications with osseointegrated implants.

    J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 581-585

  • Theoretical assessment of cross sections for cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.

    J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 23-30

  • Biomechanical concerns with fixed partial dentures involving implants.

    Implant Dent. 1993; 2: 221-242

    • von Gonten A.S.
    • Medina Jr., T.
    • Woolsey G.D.
    • Hill D.R.

    Modifications in the design and fabrication of mandibular osseointegrated fixed prostheses frameworks.

    J Prosthodont. 1995; 4: 82-89

  • Alternative prosthodontic superstructure designs.

    Swed Dent J Suppl. 1985; 28: 71-75

  • Cantilever lengths and anterior-posterior spreads of interim, acrylic resin, full-arch screw-retained prostheses and their relationship to prosthetic complications.

    J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 502-507

    • Rodriguez A.M.
    • Aquilino S.A.
    • Lund P.S.

    Cantilever and implant biomechanics: a review of the literature, part 2.

    J Prosthodont. 1994; 3: 114-118

  • Overdenture design to maximize stability and function.

    Dent Today. 2017; 36: 108-112

    • Sharma S.
    • Makkar M.
    • Teja S.S.
    • Singh P.

    Implant-supported overdenture: a review.

    J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2017; 07: 270-277

    • Greenstein G.
    • Cavallaro Jr., J.

    Cantilevers extending from unilateral implant-supported fixed prostheses: a review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines.

    JADA. 2010; 141: 1221-1230

  • Brunski J. Biomechanics.

    in: Worthington P. Lang B.R. Rubenstein J.E. Osseointegration in Dentistry. 2nd ed. Quintessence,
    Hanover Park, IL2003: 49-84



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment