WHO Human Genetics Programme. Global strategies to reduce the health-care burden of craniofacial anomalies: Report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002).
Bergland, O., Semb, G. & Abyholm, F. E. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J. 23, 175–205 (1986).
Boyne, P. J. & Sands, N. R. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J. Oral Surg. 30, 87–92 (1972).
da Silva Filho, O. G., Teles, S. G., Ozawa, T. O. & Filho, L. C. Secondary bone graft and eruption of the permanent canine in patients with alveolar clefts: Literature review and case report. Angle Orthod. 70, 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0174:SBGAEO>2.0.CO;2 (2000).
Ma, L., Hou, Y., Liu, G. & Zhang, T. Effectiveness of presurgical orthodontics in cleft lip and palate patients with alveolar bone grafting: A systematic review. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 122, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.07.010 (2021).
Chetpakdeechit, W., Pisek, P., Pitiphat, W. & Rattanakanokchai, S. Cleft size and success of secondary alveolar bone grafting—A systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 60, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211059361 (2023).
Enemark, H., Sindet-Pedersen, S., Bundgaard, M. & Simonsen, E. K. Combined orthodontic-surgical treatment of alveolar clefts. Ann. Plast. Surg. 21, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198808000-00006 (1988).
Newlands, L. C. Secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 38, 488–491. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2000.0300 (2000).
Sharma, S., Rao, D. J., Majumder, K. & Jain, H. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: Radiographic and clinical evaluation. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.95316 (2012).
Linderup, B. W., Kuseler, A., Jensen, J. & Cattaneo, P. M. A novel semiautomatic technique for volumetric assessment of the alveolar bone defect using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 52, e47-55. https://doi.org/10.1597/13-287 (2015).
Shirota, T. et al. Analysis of bone volume using computer simulation system for secondary bone graft in alveolar cleft. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 39, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.04.050 (2010).
Bradrick, J. P., Smith, A. S., Ohman, J. C. & Indresano, A. T. Estimation of maxillary alveolar cleft volume by three-dimensional CT. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 14, 994–996. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199011000-00025 (1990).
de Moura, P. M., Hallac, R., Kane, A. & Seaward, J. Improving the evaluation of alveolar bone grafts with cone beam computerized tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 53, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-304 (2016).
Yu, X., Huang, Y. & Li, W. Correlation between alveolar cleft morphology and the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting for unilateral cleft lip and palate. BMC Oral Health 22, 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02265-4 (2022).
Wang, X. et al. 3D morphometric quantification of maxillae and defects for patients with unilateral cleft palate via deep learning-based CBCT image auto-segmentation. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 24(Suppl 2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12482 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al Volumetric registration-based cleft volume estimation of alveolar cleft grafting procedures. In 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 99–103 (2020).
Gillot, M. et al. Automatic multi-anatomical skull structure segmentation of cone-beam computed tomography scans using 3D UNETR. PLoS One 17, e0275033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275033 (2022).
Al Turkestani, N. et al. Clinical decision support systems in orthodontics: A narrative review of data science approaches. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 24 Suppl 2, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12492 (2021).
Reyes, M. et al. On the interpretability of artificial intelligence in radiology: Challenges and opportunities. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2, e190043. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2020190043 (2020).
Yushkevich, P. A. & Gerig, G. ITK-SNAP: An intractive medical image segmentation tool to meet the need for expert-guided segmentation of complex medical images. IEEE Pulse 8, 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2017.2701493 (2017).
Slicer 3D. https://download.slicer.org. Accessed 27 Mar 2023 (2023).
Ruellas, A. C. et al. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 149, 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.021 (2016).
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977).
Su, H., Maji, S., Kalogerakis, E. & Learned-Miller, E. Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3D shape recognition. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 945–953 (IEEE Computer Society, 2015).
Boumbolo, L. et al. FlyBy CNN: A 3D surface segmentation framework. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2582205 (2021).
Chorowski, J. K., Bahdanau, D., Serdyuk, D., Cho, K. & Bengio, Y. Attention-based models for speech recognition. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 28, 15 (2015).
Selvaraju, R. R. et al. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128, 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 (2020).
Adadi, A. & Berrada, M. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 (2018).
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R. & Yu, B. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22071–22080. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900654116 (2019).
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A. & Viergever, M. A. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 79, 102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 (2022).
Petsiuk, V., Das, A. & Saenko, K. Rise: Randomized input sampling for explanation of black-box models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07421 (2018).
Chattopadhay, A., Sarkar, A., Howlader, P. & Balasubramanian, V. N. Grad-CAM++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. In 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 839–847 (2018).
Ivanovs, M., Kadikis, R. & Ozols, K. Perturbation-based methods for explaining deep neural networks: A survey. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 150, 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2021.06.030 (2021).
Bianchi, J. et al. Three-dimensional digital applications for implant space planning in orthodontics: A narrative review. J. World Fed. Orthod. 11, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.10.006 (2022).
Firestone, A. R., Sema, D., Heaven, T. J. & Weems, R. A. The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images. Caries Res. 32, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016442 (1998).
Huqh, M. Z. U. et al. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in children with cleft lip and palate—A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710860 (2022).
Yagi, M., Ohno, H. & Takada, K. Decision-making system for orthodontic treatment planning based on direct implementation of expertise knowledge. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2894–2897, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626317 (2010).
Concato, J. et al. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research. Am. J. Med. 123, e16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.004 (2010).
Keener, D. J. et al. Three-dimensional decision support system for treatment of canine impaction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.02.016 (2023).
Thurzo, A., Urbanová, W., Neuschlová, I., Paouris, D. & Čverha, M. Use of optical scanning and 3D printing to fabricate customized appliances for patients with craniofacial disorders. Semin. Orthod. 28, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2022.10.005 (2022).
