Home Dental Radiology Direct materials for restoring caries lesions

Direct materials for restoring caries lesions

by adminjay

  • Sugars and Dental Caries. World Health Organization; 2017.

  • Oral and dental health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Dental caries among adults and older adults: older adults aged 65 years or older. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    • Watt R.G.
    • Daly B.
    • Allison P.
    • et al.

    Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action.

    Lancet. 2019; 394: 261-272

    • Schwendicke F.
    • Frencken J.E.
    • Bjørndal L.
    • et al.

    Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal.

    Adv Dent Res. 2016; 28: 58-67

    • Fontana M.
    • Pilcher L.
    • Tampi M.P.
    • et al.

    Caries management for the modern age: improving practice one guideline at a time.

    JADA. 2018; 149: 935-937

  • Minamata Convention on Mercury. United Nations,
    • Rasines Alcaraz M.G.
    • Veitz-Keenan A.
    • Sahrmann P.
    • et al.

    Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; ()

    • Estrich C.G.
    • Lipman R.D.
    • Araujo M.W.B.

    Dental amalgam restorations in nationally representative sample of US population aged ≥15 years: NHANES 2011-2016.

    J Public Health Dent. 2021; 81: 327-330

    • Page M.J.
    • McKenzie J.E.
    • Bossuyt P.M.
    • et al.

    The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

    BMJ. 2021; 372: n71

    • Lefebvre C.
    • Glanville J.
    • Briscoe S.
    • et al.

    Technical supplement to chapter 4: searching for and selecting studies.

    in: Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane,

    • Friedrich J.O.
    • Adhikari N.K.
    • Beyene J.

    Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7: 5

  • A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller, and hybrid composite resin fillings: a 6-year follow-up study.

    Acta Odontol Scand. 1986; 44: 357-367

    • van Dijken J.W.
    • Pallesen U.

    Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.

    J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17: 81-88

  • Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9: 215-232

  • Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events.

    Evid Based Ment Health. 2018; 21: 72-76

    • Sterne J.A.C.
    • Savović J.
    • Page M.J.
    • et al.

    RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

    BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898

    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Kunz R.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?.

    BMJ. 2008; 336: 995-998

    • Zeng L.
    • Brignardello-Petersen R.
    • Hultcrantz M.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 137: 163-175

  • Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: a 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children.

    Niger J Clin Pract. 2020; 23: 489-497

    • Andersson-Wenckert I.
    • Sunnegardh-Gronberg K.

    Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: a two-year clinical evaluation.

    Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 334-340

    • Araujo M.P.
    • Innes N.P.
    • Bonifácio C.C.
    • et al.

    Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting.

    BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 318

    • Atabek D.
    • Aktas N.
    • Sakaryali D.
    • Bani M.

    Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.

    Quintessence Int. 2017; 48: 743-751

  • A two-year clinical comparison of three different restorative materials in class II cavities.

    Oper Dent. 2020; 45: E32-E42

  • A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations.

    Aust Dent J. 1994; 39: 77-81

    • Collins C.J.
    • Bryant R.W.
    • Hodge K.L.

    A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings.

    J Dent. 1998; 26: 311-317

    • Daou M.H.
    • Tavernier B.
    • Meyer J.M.

    Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars.

    J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009; 34: 53-58

    • De Moor R.J.
    • Stassen I.G.
    • van ‘t Veldt Y.
    • Torbeyns D.
    • Hommez G.M.

    Two-year clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in xerostomic head- and neck-irradiated cancer patients.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15: 31-38

    • Dermata A.
    • Papageorgiou S.N.
    • Fragkou S.
    • Kotsanos N.

    Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.

    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018; 19: 393-401

    • Dresch W.
    • Volpato S.
    • Gomes J.C.
    • Ribeiro N.R.
    • Reis A.
    • Loguercio A.D.

    Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.

    Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 409-417

    • Ehlers V.
    • Gran K.
    • Callaway A.
    • Azrak B.
    • Ernst C.P.

    One-year clinical performance of flowable bulk-fill composite vs conventional compomer restorations in primary molars.

    J Adhes Dent. 2019; 21: 247-254

    • El-Housseiny A.A.
    • Alamoudi N.M.
    • Nouri S.
    • Felemban O.

    A randomized controlled clinical trial of glass carbomer restorations in Class II cavities in primary molars: 12-month results.

    Quintessence Int. 2019; 50: 522-532

    • Ercan E.
    • Dulgergil C.T.
    • Soyman M.
    • Dalli M.
    • Yildirim I.

    A field-trial of two restorative materials used with atraumatic restorative treatment in rural Turkey: 24-month results.

    J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 307-314

    • Ersin N.K.
    • Candan U.
    • Aykut A.
    • Onçağ O.
    • Eronat C.
    • Kose T.

    A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.

    JADA. 2006; 137: 1529-1536

    • Espindola-Castro L.F.
    • Guimarães R.P.
    • de Souza F.B.
    • et al.

    A 14-year follow-up of resin composite occlusal restorations: split mouth randomised clinical trial and wear evaluation by optical coherence tomography.

    J Clin Diag Res. 2019; 13: ZC10-ZC15

    • Fuks A.B.
    • Araujo F.B.
    • Osorio L.B.
    • Hadani P.E.
    • Pinto A.S.

    Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars.

    Pediatr Dent. 2000; 22: 479-485

    • Gurgan S.
    • Kutuk Z.B.
    • Yalcin Cakir F.
    • Ergin E.

    A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities.

    J Dent. 2020; 94103175

    • Hatirli H.
    • Yasa B.
    • Celik E.U.

    Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 5493-5503

    • Hayes M.
    • da Mata C.
    • Tada S.
    • et al.

    Evaluation of biodentine in the restoration of root caries: a randomized controlled trial.

    JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016; 1: 51-58

    • Hoseinifar R.
    • Mortazavi-Lahijani E.
    • Mollahassani H.
    • Ghaderi A.

    One year clinical evaluation of a low shrinkage composite compared with a packable composite resin: a randomized clinical trial.

    J Dent (Tehran). 2017; 14: 84-91

  • Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars: a 3-year clinical study.

    Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 13: 2-8

    • Kharma K.
    • Zogheib T.
    • Bhandi S.
    • Mehanna C.

    Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composite and glass ionomer restorative material in permanent teeth.

    J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19: 226-232

    • Koc Vural U.
    • Kerimova L.
    • Kiremitci A.

    Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.

    Odontology. 2021; 109: 376-384

  • Clinical evaluation of Kerr SonicFill 2 vs 3M ESPE Filtek Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03032705. Updated December 13, 2021.

    • Kupietzky A.
    • Atia Joachim D.
    • Tal E.
    • Moskovitz M.

    Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial.

    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019; 20: 451-456

    • Loguercio A.D.
    • Reis A.
    • Hernandez P.A.
    • Macedo R.P.
    • Busato A.L.

    3-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.

    J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33: 144-151

    • Loguercio A.D.
    • Lorini E.
    • Weiss R.V.
    • et al.

    A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations.

    J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 57-64

    • McComb D.
    • Erickson R.L.
    • Maxymiw W.G.
    • Wood R.E.

    A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.

    Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 430-437

    • Molina G.F.
    • Ulloque M.J.
    • Mazzola I.
    • Mulder J.
    • Frencken J.

    Randomized controlled trial of Class II ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement and conventional resin-composite restorations in permanent dentition: two-year survival.

    J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22: 555-565

  • Clinical performance of Equia FIL GC high-density glass ionomer compared to Nu Alloy amalgam restorations in patients with disabilities with symptomless caries: 26 month evaluation randomized controlled trial. anzctr.org.au identifier: ACTRN12621001668897.

  • Clinical efficacy of the conventional glass ionomer cement and resin modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars.

    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014; 26: 587-590

    • Mundada M.V.
    • Hugar S.M.
    • Hallikerimath S.
    • Davalbhakta R.
    • Gokhale N.S.
    • Shah S.V.

    Comparative evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of compomer and glass hybrid bulk fill restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition: an in vivo two-arm parallel-group double-blinded randomized controlled study.

    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020; 13: S45-S54

    • Olegario I.C.
    • Hesse D.
    • Mendes F.M.
    • Bonifácio C.C.
    • Raggio D.P.

    Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23 ()

    • Palaniappan S.
    • Elsen L.
    • Lijnen I.
    • Peumans M.
    • Meerbeek B.V.
    • Lambrechts P.

    Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations.

    Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14: 441-458

    • Sadeghi M.
    • Lynch C.D.
    • Shahamat N.

    Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.

    J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 532-537

    • Shi L.
    • Wang X.
    • Zhao Q.
    • et al.

    Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.

    Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 11-19

    • Wilson M.A.
    • Cowan A.J.
    • Randall R.C.
    • Crisp R.J.
    • Wilson N.H.

    A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results.

    Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 423-429

    • Balkaya H.
    • Arslan S.
    • Pala K.

    A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.

    J Appl Oral Sci. 2019; 27e20180678

    • Daou M.H.
    • Tavernier B.
    • Meyer J.M.

    Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.

    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2008; 118: 290-295

    • Gurgan S.
    • Kutuk Z.B.
    • Ergin E.
    • Oztas S.S.
    • Cakir F.Y.

    Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.

    Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 134-143

    • Loguercio A.D.
    • Reis A.
    • Rodrigues Filho L.E.
    • Busato A.L.

    One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations.

    Oper Dent. 2001; 26: 427-434

  • Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3. Cochrane,
    • Tedesco T.K.
    • Gimenez T.
    • Floriano I.
    • et al.

    Scientific evidence for the management of dentin caries lesions in pediatric dentistry: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    PLoS One. 2018; 13e0206296

    • Pires C.W.
    • Pedrotti D.
    • Lenzi T.L.
    • Soares F.Z.M.
    • Ziegelmann P.K.
    • Rocha R.O.

    Is there a best conventional material for restoring posterior primary teeth? A network meta-analysis.

    Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: e10

    • Dias A.G.A.
    • Magno M.B.
    • Delbem A.C.B.
    • Cunha R.F.
    • Maia L.C.
    • Pessan J.P.

    Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    J Dent. 2018; 73: 1-13

    • Worthington H.V.
    • Khangura S.
    • Seal K.
    • et al.

    Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 8 ()

    • Vetromilla B.M.
    • Opdam N.J.
    • Leida F.L.
    • et al.

    Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    JADA. 2020; 151: 614-624,e18

    • Afrashtehfar K.I.
    • Emami E.
    • Ahmadi M.
    • Eilayyan O.
    • Abi-Nader S.
    • Tamimi F.

    Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: a systematic review.

    J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 345-353,e8

    • Meyer-Lueckel H.
    • Machiulskiene V.
    • Giacaman R.A.

    How to intervene in the root caries process? Systematic review and meta-analyses.

    Caries Res. 2019; 53: 599-608

    • Maran B.M.
    • de Geus J.L.
    • Gutierrez M.F.
    • et al.

    Nanofilled/nanohybrid and hybrid resin-based composite in patients with direct restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    J Dent. 2020; 99103407

    • Brignardello-Petersen R.
    • Guyatt G.H.
    • Mustafa R.A.
    • et al.

    GRADE guidelines, 33: addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 139: 49-56

    • Puhan M.A.
    • Schünemann H.J.
    • Murad M.H.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis.

    BMJ. 2014; 349: g5630

    • Brignardello-Petersen R.
    • Bonner A.
    • Alexander P.E.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 93: 36-44

    • Alonso-Coello P.
    • Oxman A.D.
    • Moberg J.
    • et al.
    • GRADE Working Group

    GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices—2, clinical practice guidelines.

    BMJ. 2016; 353: i2089

  • Source link

    Related Articles