Home Dental Radiology Posterior dental restoration material choices in privately insured people in the United States, 2017 through 2019

Posterior dental restoration material choices in privately insured people in the United States, 2017 through 2019

by adminjay


Abstract

Background

In the context of evolving dental materials and techniques and a national agenda to phasedown use of dental amalgam, estimates of dental amalgam placement are necessary for monitoring purposes.

Methods

Numbers of amalgam and composite posterior restorations from 2017 through 2019 were calculated using retrospective dental claims analysis of privately insured patients. Kruskal-Wallis and multilevel, multivariable negative binomial regression models were used to test for differences in rates of amalgam and composite restoration placement by age group, sex, urban or rural area, and percentage race and ethnicity area distribution. Statistical significance was set at 0.05, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for false discovery rate.

Results

The rate of amalgam restorations declined over time from a mean of 6.29 per 100 patients in 2017 to 4.78 per 100 patients in 2019, whereas the composite restoration rate increased from 27.6 per 100 patients in 2017 to 28.8 per 100 in 2019. The mean number of amalgam restorations placed per person were lowest in females compared with males, in urban areas compared with rural areas, and in areas with more than 75% non-Hispanic White residents.

Conclusions

Amalgam restoration placements in privately insured people in the United States declined from 2017 through 2019. Amalgam restoration placements may be unevenly distributed by location.

Practical Implications

Achieving further declines of dental amalgam use may require changes to insurance coverage, incentives, and provider training as well as augmented disease prevention and health promotion efforts. These efforts should focus particularly on groups with high caries risk or higher rates of amalgam placement.

Key Words

In the United States, disparities in caries prevalence by sociodemographic characteristics are well documented.

1

  • Dye B.A.
  • Thornton-Evans G.
  • Li X.
  • Iafolla T.J.
Dental caries and sealant prevalence in children and adolescents in the United States, 2011-2012.