Shin, S. The trend of National Health Insurance dental treatment in the last 10 years. Policy Trends 14(6), 70–84 (2020).
Agari, K. & Le, B. Successive reimplantation of dental implants into sites of previous failure. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 78(3), 375–385 (2020).
Zhao, C.-R., Cho, I.-H. & Moon, E.-S. A retrospective statistical analysis of dental implants. J. Korean Acad. Prosthodont. 47(3), 266–272 (2009).
Jang, H. W. et al. A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 3(4), 204–215 (2011).
Pauwels, R. et al. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: Are Hounsfield units applicable?. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 44(1), 20140238 (2015).
de Oliveira, R. C. et al. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 105(2), 231–238 (2008).
Resnik, R. R. Misch’s Contemporary Implant Dentistry 4th edn. (Elsevier, 2021).
Kim, D. S. et al. Comparison of dental implant stabilities by impact response and resonance frequencies using artificial bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 36(6), 715–720 (2014).
Cha, J. Y. et al. Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 137(1), 73–79 (2010).
Almasoud, N. N., Tanneru, N. & Marei, H. F. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi Med. J. 37(6), 684–689 (2016).
Meredith, N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int. J. Prosthodont. 11(5), 491–501 (1998).
Kim, T.-H., Lee, D.-Y. & Jung, S.-K. Comparison of trabecular bone mineral density measurement using Hounsfield unit and trabecular microstructure in orthodontic patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Appl. Sci. 11(3), 1028 (2021).
Patil, S. M. et al. Assessment of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral density in controlled Type II diabetes in completely edentulous patients using cone-beam computed tomography—A cross sectional study with comparison group. Open J. Stomatol. 11(10), 422–436 (2021).
Molly, L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17(S2), 124–135 (2006).
Compston, J. Bone quality: What is it and how is it measured?. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia 50, 579–585 (2006).
Misch, C. E., Qu, Z. & Bidez, M. W. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: Implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 57(6), 700–706 (1999) (discussion 706-8).
Donnelly, E. Methods for assessing bone quality: A review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469(8), 2128–2138 (2011).
Swami, V., Vijayaraghavan, V. & Swami, V. Current trends to measure implant stability. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 16(2), 124–130 (2016).
Kim, D. G. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density?. J. Bone Metab. 21(2), 117–126 (2014).
Kamburoglu, K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J. Radiol. 7(6), 128–130 (2015).
Dalessandri, D. et al. Advantages of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the orthodontic treatment planning of cleidocranial dysplasia patients: A case report. Head Face Med. 7(1), 6 (2011).
Kapila, S. D. & Nervina, J. M. CBCT in orthodontics: Assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 44(1), 20140282 (2015).
De Vos, W., Casselman, J. & Swennen, G. R. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 38(6), 609–625 (2009).
Kim, J. H. et al. Extraction sockets: Erratic healing impeding factors. J. Clin. Periodontol. 41(1), 80–85 (2014).
Hohlweg-Majert, B. et al. Morphometric analysis–cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 39(5), 330–334 (2011).
Lechuga, L. & Weidlich, G. A. Cone beam CT vs. fan beam CT: A comparison of image quality and dose delivered between two differing CT imaging modalities. Cureus 8(9), e778 (2016).
Kiljunen, T. et al. Dental cone beam CT: A review. Phys. Med. 31(8), 844–860 (2015).
Woelber, J. P. et al. Accuracy and usefulness of CBCT in periodontology: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Periodont. Restor. Dent. 38(2), 289–297 (2018).
Cann, C. E. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: A review. Radiology 166(2), 509–522 (1988).
Schulze, R. et al. Artefacts in CBCT: A review. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 40(5), 265–273 (2011).
Silva, I. M. et al. Bone density: Comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz. Oral Res. 26(6), 550–556 (2012).
Schreiber, J. J., Anderson, P. A. & Hsu, W. K. Use of computed tomography for assessing bone mineral density. Neurosurg. Focus 37(1), E4 (2014).
Faulkner, K. G. et al. Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: Corrections to the UCSF normative data. Osteoporos. Int. 3(1), 36–42 (1993).
Barrett, J. F. & Keat, N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24(6), 1679–1691 (2004).
Dale, A. M. & Robert, A. D. A clinician’s guide to understanding cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI). Dent. Econ. 97(8), S1 (2007).
Wang, T. & Zhu, L. Image-Domain Non-uniformity Correction for Cone-beam CT 680–683 (IEEE, 2017).
Terrabuio, B. R. et al. Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: An integrative review. Imaging Sci. Dent. 51(2), 93 (2021).
Parsa, A. et al. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27(6), 1438–1442 (2012).
Katsumata, A. et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: An in vitro study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 107(3), 420–425 (2009).
Pauwels, R. et al. Development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone-beam CT. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 12(4), 245–260 (2011).
Oliveira, M. et al. Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: A phantom study. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 43(6), 20140128 (2014).
Molteni, R. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 116(1), 105–119 (2013).
Nackaerts, O. et al. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implant Res. 22(8), 873–879 (2011).
Nomura, Y. et al. Stability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral content. Clin. Oral Implant Res. 24(5), 543–548 (2013).
Nishino, K. et al. Influence of an object’s z-axis location and location on the axial plane on the voxel value representation and uniformity in cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 118(5), 619–624 (2014).
Pauwels, R. CBCT Quality Assurance. In Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 213–226 (Springer, 2018).
Razi, T., Niknami, M. & AlaviGhazani, F. Relationship between Hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects 8(2), 107–110 (2014).
Parsa, A. et al. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 26(1), e1-7 (2015).
Li, Y., Garrett, J. & Chen, G. H. Reduction of beam hardening artifacts in cone-beam CT imaging via SMART-RECON algorithm. In Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, vol. 9783 (2016).
Bechara, B. B. et al. Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 41(3), 248–253 (2012).
Elstrom, U. V. et al. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region. Acta Oncol. 50(6), 908–917 (2011).
Zhu, L. et al. Scatter correction for cone-beam CT in radiation therapy. Med. Phys. 36(6), 2258–2268 (2009).
Genant, H. K. & Jiang, Y. Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1068(1), 410–428 (2006).
Song, Y.-D., Jun, S.-H. & Kwon, J.-J. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 24(1), 59–64 (2009).
Rebaudi, A. et al. Preoperative evaluation of bone quality and bone density using a novel CT/microCT-based hard-normal-soft classification system. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 25(1), 75–85 (2010).
Mah, P., Reeves, T. E. & McDavid, W. D. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 39(6), 323–335 (2010).
Reeves, T. E., Mah, P. & McDavid, W. D. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: A clinical application. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 41(6), 500–508 (2012).
Cao, Q. et al. Quantitative cone-beam CT of bone mineral density using model-based reconstruction. In Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, vol. 10948 (2019).
Nomura, Y. et al. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21(5), 558–562 (2010).
Naitoh, M. et al. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: Relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20(5), 503–506 (2009).
He, K. et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016).
Kim, H. G. et al. Improvement diagnostic accuracy of sinusitis recognition in paranasal sinus X-ray using multiple deep learning models. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 9(6), 942–951 (2019).
Shahidi, S. et al. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 42(1), 20110187–20110187 (2013).
Yi, X., Walia, E. & Babyn, P. Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review. Med. Image Anal. 58, 101552 (2019).
Yi, X. & Babyn, P. Sharpness-aware low-dose CT denoising using conditional generative adversarial network. J. Digit. Imaging 31(5), 655–669 (2018).
Harms, J. et al. Paired cycle-GAN-based image correction for quantitative cone-beam computed tomography. Med. Phys. 46(9), 3998–4009 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Improving CBCT quality to CT level using deep learning with generative adversarial network. Med. Phys. 48(6), 2816–2826 (2021).
Huang, Z. et al. CaGAN: A cycle-consistent generative adversarial network with attention for low-dose CT imaging. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 6, 1203–1218 (2020).
Xu, T. et al. Attngan: Fine-grained text to image generation with attentional generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2018).
Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27, 2672–2680 (2014).
Zhu, J.-Y. et al. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2017).
Kida, S. et al. Cone beam computed tomography image quality improvement using a deep convolutional neural network. Cureus 10(4), e2548 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. Synthetic CT generation from CBCT images via deep learning. Med. Phys. 47(3), 1115–1125 (2020).
Kim, J. et al. U-gat-it: Unsupervised generative attentional networks with adaptive layer-instance normalization for image-to-image translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.10830, 2019.
Andersson, J., Ahlstrom, H. & Kullberg, J. Separation of water and fat signal in whole-body gradient echo scans using convolutional neural networks. Magn. Reason. Med. 82(3), 1177–1186 (2019).
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (Springer, 2015).
Yong, T. H. et al. QCBCT-NET for direct measurement of bone mineral density from quantitative cone-beam CT: A human skull phantom study. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 15083 (2021).
Pak, S.-I. & Oh, T.-H. Statistical test of agreement between measurements in method-comparison study. J. Vet. Clin. 28(1), 108–112 (2011).
Bamba, J. et al. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 42(8), 20120445 (2013).
Katsumata, A. et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 104(6), 829–836 (2007).
Naitoh, M. et al. Stability of voxel values in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 30(2), 147–152 (2014).
Plachtovics, M. et al. High-quality image acquisition by double exposure overlap in cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 117(6), 760–767 (2014).
Kim, D.-S. et al. A new method for the evaluation of dental implant stability using an inductive sensor. Med. Eng. Phys. 34(9), 1247–1252 (2012).
Sennerby, L. et al. Evaluation of a novel cone beam computed tomography scanner for bone density examinations in preoperative 3D reconstructions and correlation with primary implant stability. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 17(5), 844–853 (2015).
Monje, A. et al. Relationship between primary/mechanical and secondary/biological implant stability. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 34, s7–s23 (2019).
Zhang, K. et al. Mitigating bias in radiology machine learning: 2. Model development. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 4(5), e220010 (2022).
Kim, Y. H. et al. A fully automated method of human identification based on dental panoramic radiographs using a convolutional neural network. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 51(4), 20210383 (2022).
