Home Dental Radiology Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study

Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study

by adminjay

  • 1.

    Razak PA, Richard KMJ, Thankachan RP, Hafiz KAA, Kumar KN, Sameer KM. Geriatric oral health: a review article. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):110–6.

  • 2.

    Hatcher D, Faulkner M, Hay A. Development of mechanical and mathematic models to study temporomandibular joint loading. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(3):377–84.

  • 3.

    Grunert I, Grubwieser G, Ulmer H. Bilateral investigation of the temporomandibular joint. An autopsy study of edentulous individuals. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(8):671–81.

  • 4.

    Schuster AJ, Pastorino DA, Marcello-Machado RM, Faot F. Influence of age and time since edentulism on masticatory function and quality of life in implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers: 1-year results from a paired clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(6):1466–74.

  • 5.

    Kapur KK, Garrett NR. Studies of biologic parameters for denture design. Part II: comparison of masseter muscle activity, masticatory performance, and salivary secretion rates between denture and natural dentition groups. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(3):408–13.

  • 6.

    Geraets W. Comparison of two methods for measuring orientation. Bone. 1998;23(4):383–8.

  • 7.

    Tanaka T, Sakurai T, Kashima I. Structuring of parameters for assessing vertebral bone strength by star volume analysis using a morphological filter. J Bone Miner Metab. 2001;19(3):150–8.

  • 8.

    Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent. 2011;39(4):273–92.

  • 9.

    White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(5):628–35.

  • 10.

    Law AN, Bollen A-M, Chen S-K. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(12):1734–42.

  • 11.

    Alman A, Johnson L, Calverley D, Grunwald G, Lezotte D, Hokanson J. Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(5):1631–6.

  • 12.

    Kayipmaz S, Akçay S, Sezgin ÖS, Çandirli C. Trabecular structural changes in the mandibular condyle caused by degenerative osteoarthritis: a comparative study by cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Oral Radiol. 2019;35:51–58.

  • 13.

    Gumussoy I, Duman S. Alternative cone-beam CT method for the analysis of mandibular condylar bone in patients with degenerative joint disease. Oral Radiol. 2019;36:177–182.

  • 14.

    Sugisaki M, Agematsu H, Matsunaga S, Saka H, Sakiyama K, Ide Y. Three-dimensional analysis of the internal structure of the mandibular condyle in dentulous and edentulous jaws using micro-CT. Cranio. 2009;27(2):78–877.

  • 15.

    Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM. Changed morphology and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the mandibular condyles of edentate people. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):255–9.

  • 16.

    Aggarwal H, Singh RD, Kumar M, Singh R, Siddhartha R, Jurel SK, et al. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the bone density of mandibular condyle in dentulous and edentulous jaws: an in vivo study. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(1):50–3.

  • 17.

    Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974;67(2):101–21.

  • 18.

    Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, Arvidsson LZ. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235.

  • 19.

    Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(21):2250–61.

  • 20.

    Renders G, Mulder L, Van Ruijven L, Van Eijden T. Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone. J Anat. 2007;210(3):239–48.

  • 21.

    Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assessment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular disorders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(3):382–91.

  • 22.

    Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):265–9.

  • 23.

    Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(8):767–71.

  • 24.

    Pothuaud L, Benhamou C, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Harba R, Levitz P. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):691–9.

  • 25.

    Gaalaas L, Henn L, Gaillard PR, Ahmad M, Islam MS. Analysis of trabecular bone using site-specific fractal values calculated from cone beam CT images. Oral Radiol. 2014;30(2):179–85.

  • 26.

    Milam SB. Pathogenesis of degenerative temporomandibular joint arthritides. Odontology. 2005;93(1):7–15.

  • 27.

    Malheiros AS, Carvalhal ST, Pereira TL, Filho EM, Tonetto MR, Goncalves LM, et al. Association between tooth loss and degree of temporomandibular disorders: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(3):235–9.

  • 28.

    Sener E, Cinarcik S, Baksi BG. Use of fractal analysis for the discrimination of trabecular changes between individuals with healthy gingiva or moderate periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(12):1364–9.

  • 29.

    Veenland JF, Grashuis J, Weinans H, Ding M, Vrooman HA. Suitability of texture features to assess changes in trabecular bone architecture. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2002;23(4):395–403.

  • 30.

    Van Ruijven L, Giesen E, Mulder L, Farella M, Van Eijden T. The effect of bone loss on rod-like and plate-like trabeculae in the cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Bone. 2005;36(6):1078–85.

  • 31.

    Choi DY, Sun KH, Won SY, Lee JG, Hu KS, Kim KD, et al. Trabecular bone ratio of the mandibular condyle according to the presence of teeth: a micro-CT study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(6):519–26.

  • 32.

    Chen J, Sorensen K, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17(3):354–61.

  • 33.

    Dufour R, Winzenrieth R, Heraud A, Hans D, Mehsen N. Generation and validation of a normative, age-specific reference curve for lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) in French women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(11):2837–46.

  • 34.

    Hongo T, Orihara K, Onoda Y, Nakajima K, Ide Y. Quantitative and morphological studies of the trabecular bones in the condyloid processes of the Japanese mandibles; changes due to aging. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1989;30(3):165–74.

  • 35.

    Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, McDaniel L, et al. A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(2):205–14.

  • 36.

    Magnusson C, Nilsson M, Magnusson T. Degenerative changes in human temporomandibular joints in relation to occlusal support. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(5):305–11.

  • 37.

    Beaupré G, Orr T, Carter D. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(5):662–70.

  • 38.

    Lai Y, Qin L, Hung V, Chan K. Regional differences in cortical bone mineral density in the weight-bearing long bone shaft—a pQCT study. Bone. 2005;36(3):465–71.

  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment