Home Aesthetic Dentistry Enhancing subgingival margin restoration: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of deep margin elevation’s impact on microleakage

Enhancing subgingival margin restoration: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of deep margin elevation’s impact on microleakage

by adminjay


  • Grubbs TD, Vargas M, Kolker J, Teixeira EC. Efficacy of direct restorative materials in proximal box elevation on the margin quality and fracture resistance of molars restored With CAD/CAM onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:52–61.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmidt JC, Sahrmann P, Weiger R, Schmidlin PR, Walter C. Biologic width dimensions-a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:493–504.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pilalas I, Tsalikis L, Tatakis DN. Pre-restorative crown lengthening surgery outcomes: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:1094–108.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patil K, Khalighinejad N, El-Refai N, Williams K, Mickel A. The effect of crown lengthening on the outcome of endodontically treated posterior teeth: 10-year survival analysis. J Endod. 2019;45:696–700.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep margin elevation: A paradigm shift. Amer J Esthet Dent. 2012;2:86–96.

  • Lanning SK, Waldrop TC, Gunsolley JC, Maynard JG. Surgical crown lengthening: evaluation of the biological width. J Periodontol. 2003;74:468–74.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müller V, Friedl KH, Friedl K, Hahnel S, Handel G, Lang R. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:607–12.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Krämer N, Naumann M, Koch A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:177–83.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:317–24.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aldakheel M, Aldosary K, Alnafissah S, Alaamer R, Alqahtani A, Almuhtab N. Deep margin elevation: current concepts and clinical considerations: a review. Medicina. 2022;58:1482.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adel M, Hamdy A, Sabet A, Ebeid K. Effect of cervical margin relocation on marginal adaptation and microleakage of indirect ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont. 2024;33:374–81.

  • Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod. 1990;16:70–77.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: in vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e793–798.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Ntovas P, Rahiotis C, Blatz MB. Deep margin elevation: a literature review. Dent J. 2022;10:48.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Theisen CER, Amato J, Krastl G, Attin T, Blatz MB, Weiger R, et al. Quality of CAD-CAM inlays placed on aged resin-based composite restorations used as deep margin elevation: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:2691–703.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tran L, Tam DNH, Elshafay A, Dang T, Hirayama K, Huy NT. Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21:101.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang H, Li H, Cong Q, Zhang Z, Du A, Wang Y. Effect of proximal box elevation on fracture resistance and microleakage of premolars restored with ceramic endocrowns. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0252269.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alahmari NM, Adawi HA, Moaleem MMA, Alqahtani FM, Alshahrani FT, Aldhelai TA. Effects of the cervical marginal relocation technique on the marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic crowns on premolars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:900–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bresser RA, van de Geer L, Gerdolle D, Schepke U, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and Preparation Design on the Fracture Strength of Indirectly Restored Molars. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103950.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Appelt A, Lohbauer U, Naumann M, Roggendorf MJ. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Dent Mater. 2011;27:892–8.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A, et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent. 2012;40:1068–73.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spreafico R, Marchesi G, Turco G, Frassetto A, Di Lenarda R, Mazzoni A, et al. Evaluation of the in vitro effects of cervical marginal relocation using composite resins on the marginal quality of CAD/CAM crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18:355–62.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ismail HS, Ali AI, Mehesen RE, Garcia-Godoy F, Mahmoud SH. In vitro marginal and internal adaptation of four different base materials used to elevate proximal dentin gingival margins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14:e550–e559.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pereira LFO, Perucelli F, Souza EM, Rached RN. Influence of cervical margin relocation with direct restorative materials on the marginal integrity of CAD-CAM composite inlays. Am J Dent. 2022;35:30–36.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Borouziniat A, Majidinia S, Shirazi AS, Kahnemuee F. Comparison of bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etch or total-etch resin cement to zirconia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024;27:113–25.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, et al. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1021–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Theisen C, Amato J, Krastl G, Attin T, Blatz M, Weiger R, et al. Quality of CAD-CAM inlays placed on aged resin-based composite restorations used as deep margin elevation: a laboratory study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:3.

  • Köken S, Juloski J, Ferrari M. Influence of cervical margin relocation and adhesive system on microleakage of indirect composite restorations. J Osseointegration. 2019;11:21–28.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3:208–15.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:77–82.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kielbassa AM, Philipp F. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: Systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int. 2015;46:751–64.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lefever D, Gregor L, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Supragingival relocation of subgingivally located margins for adhesive inlays/onlays with different materials. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:561–7.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hahn B, Haubitz I, Krug R, Krastl G, Soliman S. Influence of matrix type on marginal gap formation of deep class II bulk-fill composite restorations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4961.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ariaans K, Heussen N, Schiffer H, Wienert AL, Plümäkers B, Rink L, et al. Use of molecular indicators of inflammation to assess the biocompatibility of all-ceramic restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:173–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dent Mater. 2019;35:335–43.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bertoldi C, Monari E, Cortellini P, Generali L, Lucchi A, Spinato S, et al. Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1001–11.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Suiter EA, Watson LE, Tantbirojn D, Lou JS, Versluis A. Effective expansion: balance between shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 2016;95:543–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Resin-based composites show similar kinetic profiles for dimensional change and recovery with solvent storage. Dent Mater. 2015;31:e201–217.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosales-Leal JI, Castillo-Salmerón RD, Molino-Serrano MA, González-Moreira H, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA. Effect of hygroscopic expansion of resin filling on interfacial gap and sealing: a confocal microscopy study. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:423–30.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dursun E, Nguyen J-F, Tang M-L, Attal J-P, Sadoun M. HEMA release and degree of conversion from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after various delays of light activation. Dental Mater. 2016;32:640–5.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vertolli TJ, Martinsen BD, Hanson CM, Howard RS, Kooistra S, Ye L. Effect of deep margin elevation on CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45:608–17.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moon W, Chung SH, Chang J. Effect of deep margin elevation on interfacial gap development of CAD/CAM inlays after thermomechanical cycling Operative Dentistry (vol 46, pg 529, 2021). Oper Dent. 2023;48:348–348.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Czarnecka B, Kruszelnicki A, Kao A, Strykowska M, Nicholson JW. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique. Dent Mater. 2014;30:e301–305.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karadas M, Atıcı MG. Bond strength and adaptation of pulp capping materials to dentin. Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83:514–22.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Mattos Pimenta Vidal C, Pavan S, Briso AL, Bedran-Russo AK. Effects of three restorative techniques in the bond strength and nanoleakage at gingival wall of Class II restorations subjected to simulated aging. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:627–33.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muscholl C, Zamorska N, Schoilew K, Sekundo C, Meller C, Büsch C, et al. Retrospective clinical evaluation of subgingival composite resin restorations with deep-margin elevation. J Adhes Dent. 2022;24:335–44.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles