Home Dental Radiology Automatic measurement of mandibular cortical bone width on cone-beam computed tomography images

Automatic measurement of mandibular cortical bone width on cone-beam computed tomography images

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Alamri HM, Sadrameli M, Alshalhoob MA, Sadrameli M, Alshehri MA. Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature. Gen Dent. 2012;60:390–400.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Becker W, Hujoel PP, Becker BE, Willingham H. Osteoporosis and implant failure: an exploratory case control study. J Periodontol. 2000;71:626–31.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    von Wowern N, Gotfredsen K. Implant-supported overdentures, a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles? A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:19–25.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Amorim MA, Takayama L, Jorgetti V, Pereira RM. Comparative study of axial and femoral bone mineral density and parameters of mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants. Osteoporos Int. 2007;19:703–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:303–11.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:1–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Tözüm TF, Dursun E, Uysal S. Radiographic fractal and clinical resonance frequency analyses of posterior mandibular dental implants: their possible association with mandibular cortical index with 12-month follow-up. Implant Dent. 2016;25:789–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prosthesis: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985. p. 199–209.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Kim JY, Nah KS, Jung YH. Comparison of panorama radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in normal and osteoporotic women. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2004;34:69–74.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75:774–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Taguchi A, Tsuda M, Ohtsuka M, Kodama I, Sanada M, Nakamoto T, et al. Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:387–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Delvin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2007;104:822–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Horner K, Delvin H. The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent. 1998;26:337–43.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M. Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996;25:263–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Koh KJ, Kim KA. Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41:101–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Aydin U, Bulut A, Bulut OE, Ankara TR, Nevesehir TR. Assessment of maxillary and mandibular bone quality. EPOS. ECR 2017; C-2194. https://doi.org/10.1594/erc2017/c-2194.

  • 17.

    Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis agains disability study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2009;27:620–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Ogura I, Sasaki Y, Sue M, Oda T, Kameta A, Hayama K. Aging and cortical bone density of mandible with CBCT. Int J Diagn Imaging. 2018;5:23–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kröger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102:68–72.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Ledgerton D, Horner K, Delvin H, Worthington H. Panoramic mandibular index as a radiomorphometric tool: an assessment of precision. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997;26:95–100.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;71:349–56.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Choen JA. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–30.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Güngör E, Yildirim D, Çevik R. Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Oral Sci. 2016;58:185–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Brasileiro CB, Chalub LLFH, Abreu MHNG, Barreiros ID, Amaral TMP, Kakehasi AM, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:26.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Gomes CC, de Rezende Barbosa GL, Bello RP, Bóscolo FN, de Almeida SM. A comparison of the mandibular index on panoramic and cross-sectional images from CBCT exams from osteoporosis risk group. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:1885–90.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Koseoglu Secgin C, Gulsahi A, Yavuz Y, Kamburoglu K. Comparison of mandibular index values determined from standard panoramic versus cone beam computed tomography reconstructed images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127:257–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Miliuniene E, Alekna V, Peciuliene V, Tamulaitiene M, Maneliene R. Relationship between mandibular cortical bone height and bone mineral density of lumbar spine. Stomatologija. 2008;10:72–5.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Zebaze RMD, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A, Iuliano-Burns S, Mirams M, Price RI, et al. Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2010;375:1729–36.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment