Adams S, Baum RP, Stuckensen T, Bitter K, Hör G. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1255–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050293.
Braams JW, Pruim J, Freling NJ, Nikkels PG, Roodenburg JL, Boering G, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases of squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck with FDG-PET and MRI. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:211–6.
Hannah A, Scott AM, Tochon-Danguy H, Chan JG, Akhurst T, Berlangieri S, et al. Evaluation of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography with histopathologic correlation in the initial staging of head and neck cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236:208–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200208000-00009.
Laubenbacher C, Saumweber D, Wagner-Manslau C, Kau RJ, Herz M, Avril N, et al. Comparison of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, MRI and endoscopy for staging head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1747–57.
Teo BK, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, Carrasquillo JA, Libutti SK, Shukla H, et al. Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:802–10. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.035576.
Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932–45. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.035774.
Yamazaki Y, Saitoh M, Notani K, Tei K, Totsuka Y, Takinami S, et al. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:177–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-007-0097-9.
Woolgar JA. Pathology of the N0 neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:205–9. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1999.0035.
Don DM, Anzai Y, Lufkin RB, Fu YS, Calcaterra TC. Evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 1995;105:669–74. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199507000-00001.
van den Brekel MW, van der Waal I, Meijer CJ, Freeman JL, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. The incidence of micrometastases in neck dissection specimens obtained from elective neck dissections. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:987–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199608000-00014.
Roncali E, Cherry SR. Application of silicon photomultipliers to positron emission tomography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:1358–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0266-9.
Baratto L, Park SY, Hatami N, Davidzon G, Srinivas S, Gambhir SS, et al. 18F-FDG silicon photomultiplier PET/CT: a pilot study comparing semi-quantitative measurements with standard PET/CT. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0178936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178936.
Kojima I, Takanami K, Ogawa T, Sakamoto M, Nagai H, Miyashita H, et al. High detection sensitivity and reliable morphological correlation of PET with a silicon photomultiplier for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2020;34:643–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01489-0.
Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017.
Murakami R, Uozumi H, Hirai T, Nishimura R, Shiraishi S, Ota K, et al. Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:377–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.032.
Nguyen NC, Vercher-Conejero JL, Sattar A, Miller MA, Maniawski PJ, Jordan DW, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of a digital PET prototype in patients with oncologic diseases: initial experience and comparison with analog PET. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1378–85. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.148338.
Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Stevens H, Slump CH, Knollema S, Jager PL. Performance of digital PET compared with high-resolution conventional PET in patients with cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1448–54. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.238105.
Matsubara R, Kawano S, Chikui T, Kiyosue T, Goto Y, Hirano M, et al. Clinical significance of combined assessment of the maximum standardized uptake value of F-18 FDG PET with nodal size in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Acad Radiol. 2012;19:708–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.009.
Liberini V, Messerli M, Husmann L, Kudura K, Grunig H, Maurer A, et al. Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:8011–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07852-7.
Yamaguchi S, Wagatsuma K, Miwa K, Ishii K, Inoue K, Fukushi M. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function. Phys Med. 2018;47:73–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.02.013.
Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):11S-20S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057182.
Schoder H, Carlson DL, Kraus DH, Stambuk HE, Gonen M, Erdi YE, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:755–62.
Ng SH, Yen TC, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, Wang HM, et al. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4371–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7349.
Jeong HS, Baek CH, Son YI, Ki Chung M, Kyung LD, Young CJ, et al. Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2007;29:203–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20504.
Jose J, Coatesworth AP, MacLennan K. Cervical metastases in upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma: histopathologic analysis and reporting. Head Neck. 2003;25:194–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10194.
Gusterson BA, Ott R, Anderson TJ, Galea MH, Elston CW, Blamey RW. Occult axillary lymph-node micrometastases in breast-cancer. The Lancet. 1990;336:434–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)91978-J.
Buyukdereli G, Guler M, Seydaoglu G. Interobserver and intraobserver variability among measurements of FDG PET/CT parameters in pulmonary tumors. Balkan Med J. 2016;33:308–15. https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.140530.
