Home Dental Radiology An overview of the 35 years of research in the oral radiology: a bibliometric analysis

An overview of the 35 years of research in the oral radiology: a bibliometric analysis

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Asaumi J. Oral radiology goes to the next stage. Oral Radiol. 2020;37(1):1–1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Ahmad P, Alam MK, Jakubovics NS, Schwendicke F, Asif JA. 100 years of the journal of dental research: a bibliometric analysis. J Dent Res. 2019;98:1425–36.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Aslam-Pervez N, Lubek JE. Most cited publications in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22:25–37.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Fardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-Cited Articles in Implant Dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2017;32:555–64. Available from: http://quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1450&article_id=17346

  • 5.

    Hui J, Han Z, Geng G, Yan W, Shao P. The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:491–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Ahmad P, Asif JA, Alam MK, Slots J. 2000 A bibliometric analysis of periodontology 2000. Periodontol. 2020;82:286–97.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Perazzo MF, Otoni ALC, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in paediatric dentistry journals: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29:692–711.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Aksoy U, Küçük M, Versiani MA, Orhan K. Publication trends in micro-CT endodontic research: a bibliometric analysis over a 25 year period. Int Endod J. 2020;54(3):1–11.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Dmytriw AA, Hui N, Singh T, Nguyen D, Omid-Fard N, Phan K, et al. Bibliometric evaluation of systematic review and meta analyses published in the top 5 “high-impact” radiology journals. Clin Imaging. 2021;71:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.008.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Yoon DY, Yun EJ, Ku YJ, Baek S, Lim KJ, Seo YL, et al. Citation classics in radiology journals: the 100 top-cited articles, 1945–2012. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:471–81. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10489.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Matthews KRW, Yang E, Lewis SW, Vaidyanathan BR, Gorman M. International scientific collaborative activities and barriers to them in eight societies. Account Res. 2020;27:477–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1774373.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Pathiraja F, Little D, Denison AR. Are radiologists the contemporary anatomists? Clin Radiol. 2014;69:458–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.014.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Arnheiter C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography usage. Oral Radiol. 2006;22:80–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, Yalçın TY. A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77:574–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Yu Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Gu Z, Zhong H, Zha Q, et al. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:816–816.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Ordinola-Zapata R, Peters OA, Nagendrababu V, Azevedo B, Dummer PMH, Neelakantan P. What is of interest in endodontology? a bibliometric review of research published in the international endodontic journal and the journal of endodontics from 1980 to 2019. Int Endod J. 2020;53:36–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Noyons ECM, Buter RK. Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;82:581–96.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Arai Y, Yamada A, Ninomiya T, Kato T, Masuda Y. Micro-computed tomography newly developed for in vivo small animal imaging. Oral Radiology. 2005;21(1):14–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, Kumazawa Y, Yosue T. Observation of the retromolar foramen and canal of the mandible: a CBCT and macroscopic study. Oral Radiology. 2011;28(1):10–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Chindasombatjaroen J, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Maeda Y, Furukawa S. Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metals: comparison of cone-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners. Oral Radiology. 2011;27(2):114–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, Yoshida S, Yosue T. Classification of the lingual foramina and their bony canals in the median region of the mandible: cone beam computed tomography observations of dry Japanese mandibles. Oral Radiology. 2007;23(2):42–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Kursun S, Öztas B, Atas H, Tastekin M. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiology. 2013;30(2):142–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-013-0154-0.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Asaumi R, Kawai T, Sato I, Yoshida S, Yosue T. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive canal and the surrounding bone using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2010;26(1):20–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Igarashi C, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto A, Morita Y, Tanaka M. Double mental foramina of the mandible on computed tomography images: a case report. Oral Radiol. 2004;20(2):68–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Tanimoto H, Arai Y. The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2009;25(2):149–153.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Aktan A, Kara I, Şener İ, Bereket C, Ay S, Çiftçi M. Radiographic study of tooth agenesis in the Turkish population. Oral Radiol. 2010;26(2):95–100.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles