Digital restorative workflows for developmental dental defects in young patients

• Beuer F.
• Schweiger J.
• Edelhoff D.

Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations.

Br Dent J. 2008; 204: 505-511

• Oberoi G.
• Nitsch S.
• Edelmayer M.
• Janjić K.
• Müller A.S.
• Agis H.

3D printing-encompassing the facets of dentistry.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6: 172

Lin J-H, Berg J. Use of digital workflow in pediatric dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. CDE World. July 2018. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://cdeworld.com/courses/21091-use-of-digital-workflow-in-pediatric-dentistry

• Davidovich E.
• Dagon S.
• Tamari I.
• Etinger M.
• Mijiritsky E.

An innovative treatment approach using digital workflow and CAD-CAM, part 2: the restoration of molar incisor hypomineralization in children.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 1499

• Davidovich E.
• Shay B.
• Nuni E.
• Mijiritsky E.

An innovative treatment approach using digital workflow and CAD-CAM, part 1: the restoration of endodontically treated molars in children.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 1364

Maintenance of space by innovative three-dimensional-printed band and loop space maintainer.

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019; 37: 205-208

• Dursun E.
• Monnier-Da Costa A.
• Moussally C.

Chairside CAD/CAM composite onlays for the restoration of primary molars.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018; 42: 349-354

• Mourouzis P.
• Arhakis A.
• Tolidis K.

Computer-aided design and manufacturing crown on primary molars: an innovative case report.

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019; 12: 76-79

Normal formation and development defects of the human dentition.

Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000; 47: 975-1000

Guideline on dental management of heritable dental developmental anomalies.

Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35: E179-E184

• Gadhia K.
• McDonald S.
• Arkutu N.
• Malik K.

Amelogenesis imperfecta: an introduction.

Br Dent J. 2012; 212: 377-379

• Smith C.E.L.
• Poulter J.A.
• Antanaviciute A.
• et al.

Amelogenesis imperfecta; genes, proteins, and pathways.

Front Physiol. 2017; 8: 435

• Chen C.F.
• Hu J.C.
• Bresciani E.
• Peters M.C.
• Estrella M.R.

Treatment considerations for patient with amelogenesis imperfecta: a review.

Braz Dent Sci. 2013; 16: 7-18

• McDonald S.
• Arkutu N.
• Malik K.
• Gadhia K.
• McKaig S.

Managing the paediatric patient with amelogenesis imperfecta.

Br Dent J. 2012; 212: 425-428

• Akin H.
• Tasveren S.
• Yeler D.Y.

Interdisciplinary approach to treating a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta: a clinical report.

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19 (): 131-135

• Saroğlu I.
• Aras S.
• Oztaş D.

Effect of deproteinization on composite bond strength in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta.

Oral Dis. 2006; 12: 305-308

The etch-bleach-seal technique for managing stained enamel defects in young permanent incisors.

Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24: 249-252

• Ravassipour D.B.
• Hart P.S.
• Hart T.C.
• et al.

Unique enamel phenotype associated with amelogenin gene (AMELX) codon 41 point mutation.

J Dent Res. 2000; 79: 1476-1481

• Schwendicke F.
• Elhennawy K.
• Reda S.
• Bekes K.
• Manton D.J.
• Krois J.

Global burden of molar incisor hypomineralization.

J Dent. 2018; 68: 10-18

• Anadioti E.
• Musharbash L.
• Blatz M.B.
• Papavasiliou G.
• Kamposiora P.

3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review.

BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 343

Lo Russo L, Zhurakivska K, Guida L, Chochlidakis K, Troiano G, Ercoli C. Comparative cost-analysis for removable complete dentures fabricated with conventional, partial, and complete digital workflows [published online ahead of print May 31, 2022]. J Prosthet Dent. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.023

• Siqueira R.
• Galli M.
• Chen Z.
• et al.

Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review.

Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 6517-6531

• Pousette Lundgren G.
• Vestlund G.M.
• Dahllöf G.

Crown therapy in young individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta: long term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

J Dent. 2018; 76: 102-108

• Pousette Lundgren G.
• Dahllöf G.

Outcome of restorative treatment in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta: a cross-sectional, retrospective study.

J Dent. 2014; 42: 1382-1389

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques.

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020; 6: 16-23

• Zimmermann M.
• Koller C.
• Hickel R.
• Kühnisch J.

Chairside treatment of amelogenesis imperfecta, including establishment of a new vertical dimension with resin nanoceramic and intraoral scanning.

J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 309-313

• Halal R.
• Nohra J.
• Akel H.

Conservative anterior treatment with CAD-CAM technology and polymer-infiltrated ceramic for a child with amelogenesis imperfecta: a 2-year follow-up.

J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 710-712

• Coachman C.
• Georg R.
• Bohner L.
• Rigo L.C.
• Sesma N.

Chairside 3D digital design and trial restoration workflow.

J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124: 514-520

• Agnini A.
• Apponi R.
• Maffei S.
• Agnini A.

Digital dental workflow for a smile makeover restoration.

Int J Esthet Dent. 2020; 15: 374-389

• Singh S.K.
• Goyal A.
• Gauba K.
• Bhandari S.
• Kaur S.

Full coverage crowns for rehabilitation of MIH affected molars: 24 month randomized clinical trial.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022; 23: 147-158

• Joda T.
• Gintaute A.
• Brägger U.
• Ferrari M.
• Weber K.
• Zitzman N.U.

Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: a double-blinded RCT.

J Dent. 2021; 113103779

• Glisic O.
• Hoejbjerre L.
• Sonnesen L.

A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models.

Angle Orthod. 2019; 89: 868-875

• Gallardo Y.R.
• Bohner L.
• Tortamano P.
• Pigozzo M.N.
• Laganá D.C.
• Sesma N.

Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review.

J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119: 214-219

• Jedliński M.
• Mazur M.
• Grocholewicz K.
• Janiszewska-Olszowska J.

3D scanners in orthodontics-current knowledge and future perspectives-a systematic review.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 1121

• Gong X.
• Dang R.
• Xu T.
• Yu Q.
• Zheng J.

Full digital workflow of nasoalveolar molding treatment in infants with cleft lip and palate.

J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31: 367-371

• Liczmanski K.
• Stamm T.
• Sauerland C.
• Blanck-Lubarsch M.

Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.

Head Face Med. 2020; 16: 11

Materials in digital dentistry-a review.

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32: 171-181

• Barazanchi A.
• Li K.C.
• Al-Amleh B.
• Lyons K.
• Waddell J.N.

Additive technology: update on current materials and applications in dentistry.

J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 156-163

• Bae E.J.
• Jeong I.D.
• Kim W.C.
• Kim J.H.

A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations.

J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118: 187-193

• Grzebieluch W.
• Kowalewski P.
• Grygier D.
• Rutkowska-Gorczyca M.
• Kozakiewicz M.
• Jurczyszyn K.

Printable and machinable dental restorative composites for CAD/CAM application-comparison of mechanical properties, fractographic, texture and fractal dimension analysis.

Materials (Basel). 2021; 14: 4919

December 2021 510(K) Clearances. US Food and Drug Administration. Updated January 4, 2022. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/510k-clearances/december-2021-510k-clearances

• Wang X.
• Shujaat S.
• Shaheen E.
• Jacobs R.

Accuracy of desktop versus professional 3D printers for maxillofacial model production: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Dent. 2021; 112103741