Home Dental Radiology Root canal morphology and symmetry of mandibular second premolars using cone-beam computed tomography

Root canal morphology and symmetry of mandibular second premolars using cone-beam computed tomography

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Krasner P, Rankow HJ. Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. J Endod. 2004;30(1):5–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Rödig T, Hülsmann M. Diagnosis and root canal treatment of a mandibular second premolar with three root canals. Int Endod J. 2003;36:912–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Sikri V, Sikri P. Mandibular premolars: aberrations in pulp space morphology. Indian J Dent Res. 1994;5:9–14.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Slowey R. Root canal anatomy: road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23:555–73.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007;33:1031–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.020.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Hoen MM, Pink FE. Contemporary endodontic retreatments: an analysis based on clinical treatment findings. J Endod. 2002;28:834–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200212000-00010.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    England MC Jr, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod. 1991;17:174–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Macri E, Zmener O. Five canals in a mandibular second premolar. J Endod. 2000;26:304–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Prakash R, Nandini S, Ballal S, Kumar SN, Kandaswamy D. Two-rooted mandibular second premolars: case report and survey. Indian J Dent Res. 2008;19:70.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28:419–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90237-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1984;58:589–99.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Gulabivala K, Aung T, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2001;34:359–70.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36:738–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;97:47–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Çalişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SŞ. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod. 1995;21:200–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80566-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8170620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8170620.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium–enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36:1547–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40:818–30.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod. 2010;36:1187–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.029.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Wu YC, Cheng WC, Chung MP, Su CC, Weng PW, Cathy Tsai YW, Chiang HS, Yeh HW, Chung CH, Shieh YS, Huang RY. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular lateral incisors is associated with the presence of distolingual root in Mandibular first molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study in a Taiwanese Population. J Endod. 2018;44:73-79.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.027.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Tolentino ES, Amoroso-Silva PA, Alcalde MP, Honório HM, Iwaki LCV, Rubira-Bullen IRF, Húngaro-Duarte MA. Limitation of diagnostic value of cone-beam CT in detecting apical root isthmuses. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190168. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0168.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Wolf TG, Paqué F, Zeller M, Willershausen B, Briseño-Marroquín B. Root canal morphology and configuration of 118 mandibular first molars by means of micro-computed tomography: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2016;42:610–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.004.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2006;39:873–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01159.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Kartal N, Yanikoğlu FC. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 1992;18:562–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81215-x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Damião de Sousa-Neto M. Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod. 2014;40:710–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.003.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974;38:456–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90374-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30:391–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00004.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J. 2004;37:494–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00837.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Al-Dahman YH, Al-Jebaly AS, Alnassar FA, Alsubait S, Allahem Z. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.10.005.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Colak M, Gungor E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:701–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.898091.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Burklein S, Heck R, Schafer E. Evaluation of the root canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selected German population using cone-beam computed tomographic data. J Endod. 2017;43:1448–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.044.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Awawdeh L, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2008;41:240–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01348.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT. Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endod. 1988;14:207–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80171-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Alkhayyal AK, Almobarak AA, Alhusain MF, Martins JN. Prevalence of C-shaped canal system in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population assessed via cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:107–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2415-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, Al-Shwaimi E, Al-Shemmery B. Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J. 2017;7:69. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.205128.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Elkady AM, Allouba K. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of root and canal morphology of maxillary premolars in Saudi subpopulation. Dental J. 2013;59:3429.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Al-Dahman Y, Al-Qahtani S, Al-Mahdi A, Al-Hawwas A. Endodontic management of mandibular premolars with three root canals: case series. Saudi Endod J. 2018;8:133–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_34_17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Al-Attas H, Al-Nazhan S. Mandibular second premolar with three root canals: report of a case. Saudi Dent J. 2003;15:145–7.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Al-Fouzan KS. The microscopic diagnosis and treatment of a mandibular second premolar with four canals. Int Endod J. 2001;34:406–10.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Zhang D, Chen J, Lan G, Li M, An J, Wen X, Liu L, Deng M. The root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1007–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1852-x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Vanbelle S. Comparing dependent kappa coefficients obtained on multilevel data. Biom J. 2017;59:1016–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201600093.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Li YH, Bao SJ, Yang XW, Tian XM, Wei B, Zheng YL. Symmetry of root anatomy and root canal morphology in maxillary premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;94:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.06.020.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Wolf TG, Kozaczek C, Siegrist M, Betthäuser M, Paqué F, Briseño-Marroquín B. An ex vivo study of root canal system configuration and morphology of 115 maxillary first premolars. J Endod. 2020;46:794–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.001.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Funakoshi T, Shibata T, Inamoto K, Shibata N, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Nakata K, Ariji E. Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance. Oral Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00486-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Martins JNR, Marques D, Silva E, Caramês J, Versiani MA. Prevalence studies on root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: a systematic review. J Endod. 2019;45:372-86.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.016.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Rahimi S, Shahi S, Yavari HR, Manafi H, Eskandarzadeh N. Root canal configuration of mandibular first and second premolars in an Iranian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1:59.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Singh S, Pawar M. Root canal morphology of South Asian Indian mandibular premolar teeth. J Endod. 2014;40:1338–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Zaatar EI, Al-Kandari AM, Alhomaidah S, Al Yasin IM. Frequency of endodontic treatment in Kuwait: radiographic evaluation of 846 endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1997;23:453–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Fayad MI, Nair M, Levin MD, Benavides E, Rubinstein RA, Barghan S, Hirschberg CS, Ruprecht A. AAE and AAOMR joint position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2015;120:508–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H, Lambrechts P, Lemberg K. European society of endodontology position statement: the use of CBCT in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014;47:502–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Martins JNR, Gu Y, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences on the root and root canal morphologies between Asian and white ethnic groups analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2018;44:1096–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.001.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Yang H, Tian C, Li G, Yang L, Han X, Wang Y. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars and the location of root canal orifices and apical foramina in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod. 2013;39:435–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.003.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2017;50:761–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12685.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Johnsen GF, Dara S, Asjad S, Sunde PT, Haugen HJ. Anatomic comparison of contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017;43:956–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.012.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent. 2015;9:500–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.172623.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Martins JNR, Kishen A, Marques D, Nogueira Leal Silva EJ, Caramês J, Mata A, Versiani MA. Preferred reporting items for epidemiologic cross-sectional studies on root and root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic technology: a systematized assessment. J Endod. 2020;46:915–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.020.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Bansal R, Hegde S, Astekar M. Classification of root canal configurations: a review and a new proposal of nomenclature system for root canal configuration. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12:ZE01–5. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2018/35023.11615.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Comment