Home Dental Radiology Evaluation the relationship between the position and impaction level of the impacted maxillary third molar teeth and marginal bone loss, caries and resorption findings of the second molar teeth with CBCT scans

Evaluation the relationship between the position and impaction level of the impacted maxillary third molar teeth and marginal bone loss, caries and resorption findings of the second molar teeth with CBCT scans

by adminjay


  • 1.

    Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2007;19:117–28.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Al-Zoubi H, Alharbi AA, Ferguson DJ, Zafar MS. Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: a retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:117.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Quek S, Tay C, Tay K, Toh S, Lim K. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:548–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Chou Y-H, Ho P-S, Ho K-Y, Wang W-C, Hu K-F. Association between the eruption of the third molar and caries and periodontitis distal to the second molars in elderly patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33:246–51.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Song F, Landes D, Glenny A, Sheldon T. Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews. Br Dent J. 1997;182:339–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Khawaja NA, Khalil H, Parveen K, Al-Mutiri A, Al-Mutiri S, Al-Saawi A. A retrospective radiographic survey of pathology associated with impacted third molars among patients seen in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic of College of Dentistry. Riyadh J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:13.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Nakamori K, Tomihara K, Noguchi M. Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery. World J Radiol. 2014;6:417–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Protection R. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology: the safe use of radiographs in dental practice. European Commision. 2004;136:

  • 9.

    Petersen LB, Olsen KR, Christensen J, Wenzel A. Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20140001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Archer WH. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. WB Saunders. 1975:1045–87.

  • 11.

    Lim AA, Wong CW, Allen JC. Maxillary third molar: patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perforation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1035–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Polat HB, Ozan F, Kara I, Ozdemir H, Ay S. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:41–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Bataineh AB, Albashaireh ZS, Hazza’a AM. The surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a study in decision making. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:613–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth. London, UK: NICE; 2000.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:159–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Almpani K, Kolokitha OE. Role of third molars in orthodontics. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3:132–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:140–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Yurdabakan ZZ, Okumus Ö, Pekiner FN. Evaluation of the maxillary third molars and maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1050–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Matzen LH, Schropp L, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20160330.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Hermann L, Wenzel A, Schropp L, Matzen LH. Impact of CBCT on treatment decision related to surgical removal of impacted maxillary third molars: does CBCT change the surgical approach? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190209.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Oenning ACC, Neves FS, Alencar PNB, Prado RF, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1444–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Project S. Radiation protection no 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Luxembourg: European Commision Directorate-General for Energy;2012.

  • 23.

    Altan A, Akbulut N. Does the angulation of an impacted mandibular third molar affect the prevalence of preoperative pathoses? J Dent (Shiraz). 2019;20:48–52.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Claudia A, Barbu HM, Adi L, Gultekin A, Reiser V, Gultekin P, et al. Relationship between third mandibular molar angulation and distal cervical caries in the second molar. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:2267–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Smailiene D, Trakiniene G, Beinoriene A, Tutliene U. Relationship between the position of impacted third molars and external root resorption of adjacent second molars: a retrospective CBCT study. Medicina. 2019;55:305.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Oenning AC, Melo SL, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F. Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars-a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:379–86.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Dias MJM, Franco A, Junqueira JLC, Fayad FT, Pereira PH, Oenning AC. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25:395–402.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Jung YH, Cho BH. Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45:233–40.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Andrade PF, Silva JNN, Sotto-Maior BS, Ribeiro CG, Devito KL, Assis NMSP. Three-dimensional analysis of impacted maxillary third molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study of the position and depth of impaction. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:149–55.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Related Articles